Latest News

Swiss parliament snubs European court environment ruling

The lower house of the Swiss parliament voted on Wednesday to decline a judgment purchasing Switzerland to do more to fight global warming in a move that might encourage others to resist the influence of international courts.

In April, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg released an unprecedented judgment that said Bern had actually broken the human rights of a group of older Swiss females, the KlimaSeniorinnen, by stopping working to tackle environment change.

But Bern's lower house on Wednesday followed in the actions of the upper house and passed a non-binding movement with 111 votes in favour and 72 versus blasting the court's judicial. activism. It argued there was no factor to take more action. because Switzerland, warming at more than two times the global rate,. was already doing enough.

Throughout the dispute, lawmakers denounced the court's. disturbance in Swiss democracy and one called the Strasbourg. ruling incorrect as several older ladies who brought the case. looked on.

One of the members of parliament from the conservative Swiss. People's Party, which is the biggest celebration in parliament,. appeared to mock the ladies, criticising them for bringing a case. since they are a bit too hot in the summertime.

Michael Graber, from the Valais canton, was referring to. their argument that the government's insufficient environment policies. put them at danger of passing away throughout heatwaves.

It's truly disgraceful what just happened, Stefanie. Brander, 68, informed after the vote, shaking with anger. It's an insult and a disrespect of our rights which were. confirmed by a worldwide court.

Raphael Mahaim, an attorney for the ladies's group and an MP for. the Greens, stated: For me a red line was crossed. It is a. dishonour for parliament. Outside the building, a small group. of environment protesters sat held up indications saying betrayed. shocked and alarmed.

While the governing Federal Council is complimentary to brake with. parliament, the environment minister, among its members, has. also appeared to soft-pedal the judgment.

Isabela Keuschnigg, legal researcher with the London School. of Economics, stated that if the federal government refused to carry out. the ruling, it could set a concerning precedent, weakening. the role of legal oversight in democratic governance.

Such an act, if formalised, would be unprecedented in the. Council of Europe.

But it would likewise be evidence of political pushback against. international environment action, especially after broad far-right. gains in this month's European parliament election.

The case is part of a raft of environment litigation moving. through world courts. Latin America's human rights court is set. to issue an advisory viewpoint later this year after staging. hearings across the region.

(source: Reuters)