Latest News
-
Antofagasta CEO: Trump's copper tariffs may help the project in the US that has been stalled.
Ivan Arriagada, CEO of Antofagasta Chilean Copper Mines, said that the Trump Administration's decision to impose a 50% tariff on copper imports has created an opportunity for the copper project which had been stalled in the United States. Antofagasta, a London-listed company, operates four copper mines and is developing Twin Metals Copper and Nickel Mine in Minnesota. However the project was halted after the previous Biden administration refused to grant permits due to environmental concerns. "We have a new project, and we see a chance to develop it in this context," Arriagada said at an event. He noted that it would be years before the final decision on investment could be taken. "We must continue to work with a longer-term perspective." He added that the miner had maintained its mid-term and longer-term contracts. There were no additional copper shipments for now to the United States. Since President Donald Trump opened an investigation into possible tariffs on imports of copper in February, U.S. firms have been stocking up on the metal. Chile is the largest copper producer in the world. Speaking alongside Arriagada in Chile, Mining Minister Aurora Williams said that the government has not received any precise information on how copper tariffs will be implemented. Reporting by Fabian Cambero; Writing by Daina-Beth Solomon; Editing and Marguerita Chy.
-
Nine more suspects named in Pertamina corruption probe
The Indonesia Attorney General's Office named nine new suspects on Thursday in a corruption probe involving the state energy company PT Pertamina. Indonesia previously named several former Pertamina executives in an investigation of alleged corruption between 2018 and 2023. The state and economy suffered losses of 285 trillion Rupiah (17.58 billion dollars) as a result of the criminal activities, according to prosecutors. Abdul Qohar is a director of the AGO. He said that the nine people named by the AGO were six former executives from Pertamina or its subsidiaries, a manager who worked at Trafigura trading company, a manager for Mahameru Kencana Abadi shipping company, and a beneficiary owner at PT Orbit Terminal Merak fuel terminal. Abdul, a reporter, said that the suspects had been involved in improper imports crude oil and fuels, incorrect shipping leases, and leases for fuel terminals. Pertamina's spokesperson stated on Thursday that they respect the legal process in place and are cooperating. Trafigura didn't respond immediately to an e-mail sent to the address on their website asking for a comment. PT Mahameru couldn't be reached after office hours. PT Orbit was not accessible and could not be reached immediately. In May, Indonesian investigators approached several trading firms in Singapore to conduct an investigation. Reporting by Fransiska Naangoy, editing by Philippa Feletcher.
-
Argentina appeals U.S. Court Order to Transfer 51% YPF Share
According to a Thursday court filing, Argentina has filed notice of its appeal against a U.S. ruling ordering the country to surrender the 51% stake in the state energy company YPF. The notice was filed at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and appeals a Judge Loretta Preska's decision requiring Argentina hand over shares in partial satisfaction of a $16.1 billion judgment over the state takeover in 2012 of YPF. The case revolves around Argentina's seizure by Repsol of a 51 percent stake in YPF without making a bid to minority shareholders Petersen Energia Inversora or Eton Park Capital Management. Preska ordered Argentina in September 2023 to pay $14,39 billion to Petersen, and $1.71 to Eton Park. Argentina is appealing the ruling. The Argentine Government did not respond immediately to a comment request from. Preska's move is a blow to President Javier Milei. His administration has been trying to boost foreign currency reserves, rein in inflation and manage a heavy debt load. (Reporting and Writing by Eliana Razewski. Editing by Aida Pelaez-Fernandez.)
-
Documents show that EU countries want to keep Russian gas withdrawal plans secret.
A document internal to the EU, seen by, shows that European Union governments would like Brussels to keep secret their plans to stop using Russian oil and natural gas by 2027. Last month, the European Commission proposed legislation to phase-out EU imports from Russia. A part of this would require countries produce national plans outlining measures and timelines on how they will achieve this. A draft document of the negotiations showed that EU governments are currently negotiating this proposal and have requested the Commission to keep these plans secret. The document was drafted by Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU Presidency and is leading negotiations between EU countries. The plan should also include "an explanation of the intended national or regional measures to reduce demand and encourage renewable energy production, as well as any technical, contractual, or regulatory barriers that may hinder diversification." Some countries may not want to share sensitive information about their plans for sourcing fuel from non-Russian sources or information that could impact gas prices. The document stated that while countries would still have to submit their plans for approval to Brussels, they would be required to maintain "professional secrecy", which would prevent the information from being disclosed to anyone else or any authority. The Commission's proposal did not confirm whether the plans will be kept secret. A spokesperson for the Danish EU presidency declined comment on the talks. Diplomats from EU countries will review the document in the coming week. EU diplomats say that the negotiations are still in their early stages and haven't yet addressed issues such as potential legal risks to companies who break their Russian gas contract. Slovakia and Hungary continue to import Russian gas by pipeline. They opposed the Russian Gas Ban, which Brussels designed to be passed legally without their support. Slovakia, however, has stated that it will not approve new EU sanctions against Russia for its war in Ukraine (which require unanimous approval by all 27 EU member states) unless the concerns about gas supplies are addressed. The ambassadors of EU countries are expected to discuss the package of sanctions on Friday. Robert Fico, the Prime Minister of Slovakia, said that on Thursday it was still unclear whether or not the EU has addressed Slovakia's concerns over high gas prices and its demands for compensation due to a halt in Russian gas imports. Last week, European Commission officials visited Bratislava to discuss the concerns of the government. Fico stated, "At this time, we refuse vote for the 18th set of sanctions." Kate Abnett is the reporter. Jan Lopatka contributed additional reporting. Mark Potter (Editor)
-
Trump's tariffs - What is in effect now and what might be coming?
Donald Trump, the U.S. president, has started a global war of trade with a variety of tariffs targeting individual products and nations. Trump has set an initial tariff of 10% for all imports into the United States. He also imposed additional duties on specific products or countries. Here is a listing of the targeted tariffs that he has implemented, or has threatened to implement. TARIFFS ON PRODUCTS ARE IN EFFECT Steel and Aluminum - 50% Automobiles and auto parts: 25% TARIFFS ON PRODUCTS - A THREAT Copper - 50% will take effect on August 1 Pharmacies - Up to 200% Semiconductors with a 25% or greater content Movies – 100% Timber and lumber Critical Minerals Aircraft, engines, and parts COUNTRY Tariffs in Effect Canada - 10% for energy products and 25% for all other products that are not covered by the U.S. Canada-Mexico Agreement Mexico - 25% on products that are not covered by USMCA China: 30% with some additional tariffs United Kingdom – 10% with certain auto and metal imports excluded from the higher global rates Vietnam - 20% on certain products and 40% on transshipments of third country products COUNTRY TARIFFS TO TAKE EFFECT ON AUGUST 1, Algeria 30% Bangladesh 35% Bosnia and Herzegovina 30% Brazil 50% Brunei 25% Cambodia 36% Indonesia 32% Iraq 30% Japan 25% Kazakhstan 25% Laos 40% Libya 30% Malaysia 25% Moldova 25% Myanmar 40% Philippines 20% Serbia 35% Sri Lanka 30% South Africa 30% South Korea 25% Thailand 36% Tunisia 25%
-
Climate Prediction Center predicts ENSO neutral conditions for August to October with a 56% chance.
The U.S. Climate Prediction Center said that El Nino and Southern Oscillation neutral conditions will be likely in summer 2025 in the Northern Hemisphere, with 56% of the chance occurring in August to October. Climate Prediction Center stated that neither El Nino nor La Nina is likely. The CPC stated on Thursday that the chances of La Nina conditions increasing into the fall and Winter 2025-2026 are comparable to ENSO neutral, but will remain similar. Why it's important El Nino is the warming of ocean temperatures on the surface in eastern and central Pacific. This can cause crop damage, fires, or flash floods. La Nina is a part of El Nino and the Southern Oscillation, which affects the water temperatures in central and eastern Pacific Ocean. La Nina causes cooler water temperatures which increases the risk of droughts and floods. This can have an impact on crops. When ENSO neutral, water temperature stays around average, leading to better weather and possibly higher crop yields. CONTEXT The Japan weather bureau stated that the normal weather patterns continue and that the La Nina phenomena is likely to emerge in autumn of the Northern Hemisphere. The National Weather Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has forecast above-normal activity for hurricanes in the Atlantic basin during the 2025 season. KEY QUOTES The neutral ENSO will continue until at least the end the year. The odds of transitioning to El Nino or La Nina is rather low. However, the odds of La Nina being slightly higher than El Nina, as we move closer to fall and winter, said Donald Keeney. The ENSO neutral conditions will increase planting and yields for corn/soybeans, both in the U.S. and South America. However, they may lower expectations for wheat in Australia.
-
Gold firms as safe-havens amid rising trade tensions
The gold price edged higher on Thursday, as traders flocked to bullion in response to rising trade tensions. However, gains were capped by a rise in the dollar. By 1307 GMT, spot gold had risen 0.4% to $3326.48 an ounce. U.S. Gold Futures rose 0.4% to $3335.10. Daniel Pavilonis is a senior market strategist with RJO Futures. He said, "I believe that the entire metals complex has gone up due to the knock-on effect of the tariffs on copper." "However there are limited upsides unless a geopolitical escalate occurs." On Wednesday, U.S. president Donald Trump launched another tariff attack, announcing new tariffs of 50% on U.S. imports of copper and 50% on Brazilian goods, both starting on August 1. In a recent note, Paul Wong, Market Strategist, Sprott Asset Management, said that gold is "gaining in popularity among emerging economies, who see its counterparty-free properties as appealing in a world weighed down by geopolitical risks." Minutes of the Federal Reserve meeting in June showed that only "a few" officials felt rates could be cut as early as this month. Most policymakers are still worried about the inflationary impact they expect from tariffs. The U.S. Dollar index rose 0.2%, limiting the price increase. When the U.S. Dollar strengthens, gold tends to lose its appeal as it becomes more costly for investors who hold other currencies. The number of Americans who applied for unemployment benefits dropped unexpectedly last week. This suggests that employers are holding onto workers despite signs of a cooling of the labor market. Silver spot rose by 1.4%, to $36.62 per ounce. Wong said that if you break above $35, it increases your chances of reaching $40. Palladium rose 3.5%, to $1144.40, while platinum gained 0.3%, to $1350.95.
-
Rivers in southwest China exceed warning levels and thousands are evacuated
State media reported that 25 rivers in southwest China were above safe levels after the remnants from former typhoon Danas combined with East Asian Monsoon Rains. More than 10,000 people had been evacuated. Meteorologists attribute extreme rainfall and severe floods to climate change. They pose a major challenge as they threaten to overwhelm the ageing flood defences and displace millions. Beijing Daily, a state-run publication, reported that heavy rains hit the capital as well. One area of the Chaoyang district received 68.2mm (2.7") in just one hour, on Thursday morning. The water ministry warned that ten rivers in the southwest, including Longyan which flows through densely populated Chongqing region, could rupture their levees and embankments at any moment, according to broadcaster CCTV. It added that the remaining 15 were above the level at which their banks could be blown up, but still posed a lower risk. The broadcaster reported that more than 24 hours torrential rainfall had pushed the Chishui River in Guizhou Province to its highest level since records began in 1952, and the Xiaocao River, in Sichuan Province, was at its highest for 29 years. State media reported that more than 10,000 people had been evacuated from cities of Sichuan province and Yunnan province on Wednesday, as monsoon rains from East Asia pushed northward from India. Xinhua reported on Thursday that two people were killed by torrential rainfall in Yunnan’s Zhaotong City. Beijing's health authorities have warned that the combination between frequent downpours and high temperatures, as well as humidity, increases the risk of food and water contamination. Reporting by Joe Cash & Ethan Wang. Clarence Fernandez, Mark Potter and Clarence Fernandez edited the report.
Top cases heard by the US Supreme Court in 2025-2026
The U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to decide a number of cases during its upcoming term that begins in October. These cases include issues like transgender rights; campaign finance laws; gay "conversion therapies"; crisis pregnancy centers; religious rights and the death penalty. The following are some of the cases that will be heard during the upcoming court term. Separately, the court has also acted in emergency cases involving challenges against President Donald Trump's policy.
TRANSGENDER SPORTS PARTICIPATION On July 3, the court decided to hear Idaho and West Virginia's bid to enforce state laws that prohibit transgender athletes in female sports teams of public schools. This is another civil rights challenge against Republican-backed restrictions for transgender individuals. Idaho and West Virginia appealed lower court decisions siding with transgender plaintiffs. Plaintiffs argued the laws discriminate based upon sex or transgender status, in violation of U.S. Constitution 14th Amendment equal protection guarantee and Title IX civil right statute which prohibits sex discrimination in schools. The arguments have not been scheduled.
CAMPAIGN-FINANCE On June 30, the court agreed to hear a Republican challenge, based on free speech grounds, to a federal campaign finance provision that limits spending by parties in coordination and cooperation with candidates for office. The case involved Vice President JDVance. Vance and two Republican committees, both of whom were running for U.S. Senate at the time the litigation started, appealed the ruling by a lower court that affirmed restrictions on how much money political parties can spend in campaigns, with the input of candidates they support. The question is whether the federal restrictions on coordinated campaign expenditures violate First Amendment protections against government abridgment. The arguments have not been scheduled.
The Justices agreed on March 10, to hear the challenge of a Christian therapist on free speech grounds against a Democratic-backed Colorado Law banning "conversion therapies" that are intended to change a child's sexual orientation, or gender identity. Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor, appealed the decision of a lower court that rejected her claim that a 2019 statute violated the First Amendment by censoring her communications with her clients. The state claims it regulates professional conduct and not speech. Chiles, a Colorado-based Christian therapist who believes that "people flourish when they live in accordance with God's plan including their biological gender," according to court documents. The arguments have not been scheduled.
CRISIS PREGNANCY COUNTER The court agreed on June 16 to reconsider a New Jersey operator's attempt to stop the Democratic-led attorney general of the state from investigating whether a Christian faith-based organisation deceived the women into thinking it offered abortions. First Choice Women's Resource Centers has appealed the ruling of a lower court that said the organization had to contest the attorney general's summons in state court prior to bringing a lawsuit against it. Crisis pregnancy centers offer services to pregnant women in order to prevent them from getting an abortion. Abortion rights activists have called the centers deceptive because they do not publicize their anti-abortion position. First Choice argues that it has the right to take its case to federal court, because it alleges a violation of First Amendment rights for free speech and freedom of association. The arguments have not been scheduled.
RASTAFARIAN INMATES The Justices took up on June 23, a Rastafarian's lawsuit against state prison officials in Louisiana for holding him down and shaving him bald, in violation of their religious beliefs. Damon Landor's religion dictates that he let his hair grow. He appealed the decision of a lower court to dismiss his lawsuit filed under a U.S. statute protecting against religious infringements by state and local government. Landor was not allowed to sue officials individually for damages under this law, according to the lower court. The law in question protects religious rights for people who are confined to institutions like prisons and jails. The arguments have not been scheduled.
DEATH ROW INMATES The court decided on June 6 to hear the appeal of Alabama officials against a ruling that an Alabama man convicted of murder in 1997 was intellectually disabled. This finding spared him the death penalty, but the Republican-governed State is still pushing to execute him. According to the lower court's analysis of Joseph Clifton Smith's IQ scores and expert testimony, he was deemed intellectually disabled. According to a Supreme Court precedent from 2002, the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unjust punishment is violated by executing a person with intellectual disabilities. The arguments have not been scheduled.
LOUISIANA ELECTORAL DISTRECTS The court will hear arguments for a third time in a dispute involving a Louisiana election map that increased the number of U.S. Congress districts with a majority of Black people in the state. Justices heard arguments on March 24, but ordered on June 27 that the matter be debated again. State officials and civil right groups appealed an earlier court ruling which found that the map of Louisiana's six U.S. House of Representatives district - now with two districts that are majority Black, instead of one - violated equal protection guarantees in the Constitution. The arguments have not been scheduled.
COX COMMUNICATIONS PIRACY VERDICT On June 30, the justices took up a dispute over copyright between Cox Communications, an internet service provider, and a group music labels. This was in response to a court decision that had thrown out a $1 Billion jury verdict against Cox Communications for alleged music piracy by Cox users. Cox Communications appealed the lower court decision that it was still responsible for copyright violations by its customers despite the ruling overturning the verdict. Sony Music, Universal Music Group, and Warner Music Group are among the labels. The arguments have not been scheduled.
CHEVRON and EXXON COASTAL POLLLUTION On June 16, the court agreed to hear an application by Chevron and Exxon Mobil, as well as other oil and gas firms to move lawsuits filed by two Louisiana municipalities accusing them of damaging the state's coastline over a decade-long period to federal court. The companies appealed the lower court's decision rejecting their claim that the lawsuits should be heard in federal court, because the parishes Plaquemines & Cameron were suing for oil production undertaken during World War II to fulfill U.S. Government refinery contracts. Federal court is a more friendly venue for such litigation. Arguments have not been scheduled.
ENBRIDGE PIPELLINE DISPUTE On June 30, the justices decided to hear Enbridge’s request to change the venue of Michigan’s lawsuit to force the Canadian pipe-line operator to cease operating a line beneath the Straits of Mackinac (waterways connecting two of the Great Lakes) due to environmental concerns. Enbridge appealed the lower court's decision rejecting its request to transfer the case from state to federal court. Federal court is considered to be more favourable to defendants. The arguments have not been scheduled.
(source: Reuters)