Latest News
-
Trump unveils $700 million coal support program using emergency powers
A White House official said that President Donald Trump is expected to announce Thursday that he would use his Cold War emergency powers to send nearly $700,000,000 to the U.S. coal sector to ship the fuel to Asia, and to power companies in the United States to burn the fuel domestically. The official and industry source confirmed that Trump intends to use the Defense Production Act, a law passed in 1950 that granted presidents broad authority to oversee industries considered critical to national defense, to finance?upgrades to more than a dozen power plants powered by coal, as well as to help finance two coal plants and to support the construction of an export terminal on the West Coast. The White House public schedule shows a 3:00 p.m. ET (1900 GMT), Trump's announcement about "Beautiful, Clean Coal." The Trump administration has framed the energy policy as an issue of national?security to ensure that electricity is available for AI data centers, and to reduce reliance on foreign countries. POLLUTION CONCERNS Environmentalists condemned the plan. Patrick Drupp of the Sierra Club's climate policy department called the plan a taxpayer-funded subvention for a polluting business and said that the group would challenge the initiative in court. Drupp stated that it was "disgusting and reprehensible" for the President of the United States to "give away our taxpayer dollars in order to build deadly and expensive coal-fired plants." Rich Nolan said that the National Mining Association's CEO would use the funds to increase production of a fuel that will help insulate energy consumers from price volatility and support the rising demand for electricity. Nolan stated that "the?administration supports that strategy by taking decisive actions at home to ensure upgrades are made to existing energy assets, and in?our ports to make sure that U.S. Coal can meet the needs of the world." As utilities shift to cheaper natural gas sources and renewable energy sources, coal, which accounted for more than half the electricity generated in the U.S. in 1990, is now responsible for less than one fifth. The official stated that more than half of this funding would be used to upgrade thirteen coal-fired plants. Additional money will also go towards coal facilities in Alaska and Maryland, as well as the West Gateway coal export terminal, which has been long planned in Northern California.
-
Gold prices rise as hopes for a Middle East ceasefire pressure bond and dollar yields
Gold prices rose more than 1% on Thursday, as oil prices fell due to optimism about a possible end to the Iran Conflict. This led to a fall in bond yields and a pressure on the dollar. As of 11:50 am EDT (1550GMT), spot gold was up by 1% to $4,474.07 an ounce. U.S. Gold Futures for August Delivery gained 0.8%, to $4$4,501.90. Independent metals trader Tai Wong says that reports of a ceasefire agreement between?Israel? and Lebanon? have pushed the dollar and bond yields up, allowing gold to hold above?the 200-day moving aver?, which is an important indicator. Israel and Lebanon announced late on Wednesday that they had agreed to implement ceasefire. This raised hopes of a deal being reached between Washington and Tehran. Oil prices dropped by more than 3% in response to the news amid hopes of a reopening of 'Strait of Hormuz. Gold's appeal was boosted by the lower yields of U.S. Treasuries including the 10-year bond, as well as a 0.2% decline in the dollar. Wong stated that "record highs in gold prices this year are unlikely to happen unless there is a lasting, clean ceasefire between Iran and the West, which opens Hormuz. This will allow energy prices to fall, and for markets to stop worrying over possible higher rates." Gold, the traditional "safe-haven" asset, reached a record of $5,594.82 an ounce on January 29. Since the start of the Iran conflict, in late February, it has lost about 16%. The high interest rates are a burden on non-yielding gold. Investors will now be focusing on the release of the May U.S. Employment Report. The data may shed light on the health of the labor market, which will help determine the direction the Federal Reserve takes in the future. Silver spot rose by 1.4%, to $73.74 an ounce. Platinum gained 1.7%, to $1890.40. Palladium increased 1.3%, to $1318.75. (Reporting and editing by Paul Simao in Bengaluru, Shalesh Kuber and Anjana Anil)
-
European stocks rise, Wall Street is mixed as Broadcom drags down tech; oil prices dip
Investors weighed the impact of a snag on AI and a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Lebanon on oil prices. The S&P 500, Dow and Dow Jones were all higher. However, the Nasdaq was down. Technology shares drove the losses while healthcare stocks led the gains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.70 %, the S&P 500 rose 0.25 %, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.17%. Broadcom shares fell more than 14 percent, pulling down semiconductor stocks, after disappointing results from the chipmaker disappointed investors who had bet on a surge in demand for its AI chips. Europe's stock exchanges increased by 0.42%. MSCI's global stock index fell by 0.01%. James St. Aubin is chief investment officer of Ocean Park Asset Management, Santa Monica,?California. "Today's tech action is emblematic of how fragile sentiment can be for a group that experiences massive gains in a short period of time." Brent crude prices fell?3% to return below $95 per barrel. The U.S. president Donald Trump's attempts to stop the fighting in Lebanon were undermined after the pro-Iran Hezbollah group?rejected a new ceasefire, and Israel announced that it would not be withdrawing troops from the country.
-
Boston Fed paper: Fed should focus on inflation risks amid energy crisis
New research by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston suggests that a change in the way Americans use energy could allow the Federal Reserve to concentrate monetary policy decisions on the inflationary effects of the Middle East oil price shock. In a report published on Thursday, economists at a bank said that U.S. exposure to global economic growth has changed "fundamentally", since the 1970s. This is due to increased energy efficiency and domestic production. These changes mean an increase in oil prices has less of an impact than it did before. In the meantime, the increased production of domestic energy means that higher prices are able to spur employment, and offset the job losses in the sector that would have occurred in the past. The job market is less affected by the energy crisis, which would normally lead to a large number of job losses. This would also reduce the impact on inflation. The economists concluded that "the U.S.'s economy's vulnerability to shocks from oil has fundamentally changed. It has not been eliminated, but rather reconfigured." These findings suggest that monetary policies should be more focused on the inflationary effects of oil shocks, rather than the employment effects. The paper stated that although the current shock was notable, it had a smaller economic impact than either the 1973-1974 OPEC Oil Embargo or the 1978-1980 Iranian Revolution. The authors said that "the diminished aggregate employment impacts of oil shocks decrease the likelihood of'stagflation style tradeoffs between unemployment and inflation which characterized the 1970s." The Boston Fed paper came out as Fed officials struggled to decide the future of monetary policy. The Fed will meet on 16-17 June in a meeting where policymakers are almost certain to maintain their 'interest rate target range' between 3.50% - 3.75%. Officials are trying determine if the increase in inflation pressures caused by the U.S. and Israeli war against Iran will have to be tempered with a tighter monetary policies. Officials are largely in favor of keeping rates steady, while they wait to see what the long-term impact of the war will be on price pressures. The longer war continues, the more likely it is that inflation will continue to be high. It has been consistently above the Fed's 2% target over the years. Fed officials are speculating that interest rates may need to be raised later this year, if inflation doesn't start to ease. Boston Fed research indicates that such a path would not likely lead to significant job market problems. (Reporting and editing by Andrea Ricci; Reporting by Michael S. Derby)
-
Helion, a nuclear startup, has raised $15.5 billion in its latest funding round
Helion, a nuclear fusion energy firm, announced on Thursday that it had raised $465'million in its most recent funding round. The investment was led by Thrive Capital. The round nearly triples Helion’s valuation from its last Series F round of funding in January 2025 when it raised $425m at a valuation $5.4bn. The financing highlights the increasing demand for electricity in massive data centers that are dedicated to artificial-intelligence operations. Helion now has a total funding of $1.5 billion. The company stated that proceeds from this latest round would be used to?accelerate commercial deployment, increase manufacturing capacity and support the delivery of clean electricity to customers. Helion is a company backed by OpenAI founders Sam Altman & Greg Brockman. They are among the many?public and private firms working on fusion's main challenge: generating more energy from a?reaction that is needed to initiate and contain it. Alta Park Capital and Ford Motor CEO Bill Ford were among the investors in the latest Series G round of funding. Lightspeed Venture Partners and Mithril Capital, SoftBank Vision Fund 2 as well as Good Ventures Foundation, all existing backers, also participated in the funding. The funding was announced after Helion's Polaris test machine reportedly used fusion fuel, and reached temperatures of?above?150 million degrees Celsius. The company has signed agreements in 2023 with Microsoft for the supply of electricity by 2028 and Nucor to build a 500MW Fusion Power Plant. OpenAI's Sam Altman left Helion's Board earlier this year as the two companies began to explore collaborating "at significant scale". Helion was founded in 2013 by David Kirtley, John Slough Chris Pihl and George Votroubek. Orion, its first power plant is currently under construction in Malaga (Washington). (Reporting and editing by Ditta Pujara in Bengaluru, Pranav Mathur from Bengaluru)
-
After Ukrainian strikes, Russian-held Crimea tightens up fuel restrictions
Russian-controlled Crimea tightened rationing on?fuel supplies Thursday. It suspended all cash sales of gasoline, and issued a 'new coupon' to buy it. The peninsula is grappling with a shortage of fuel linked to Ukrainian drone attacks. In recent days, drivers in the Crimea region, which was annexed from Ukraine by Russia in 2014, faced long queues at gas stations after Kyiv's attacks restricted supplies from adjacent Russian-controlled territory in southeast Ukraine. Sergei Aksyonov - the Kremlin's appointed head of Crimea - announced the new measures, which tighten restrictions on petrol sales imposed a month ago. He said that the sale of gasoline in cash would be suspended for several days. No new coupons will be issued either. The maximum amount of fuel that can be purchased with coupons is 20 litres. He blamed the rationing on "difficult conditions" without giving further details. Ukraine has been attacking fuel infrastructure near Crimea and elsewhere for a number of months, in an attempt to limit Moscow's financial ability to fund its four-year-old?war against Ukraine during a period of high global oil prices. Local Russian authorities said that Ukrainian drones attacked the Black Sea peninsula on Thursday, killing 4 people and damaging buildings. This was a day after Moscow & Kyiv exchanged strikes in each other's cities.
-
Gold prices rise as hopes for a Middle East ceasefire pressure bond and dollar yields
Gold prices rose more than 1% on Thursday, as oil prices fell due to optimism about a possible end to the Iran Conflict. This led to a fall in bond yields and pressured the dollar. As of 9:05 am EDT (1305 GMT), spot gold was up by 1.7% to $4,505.35 an ounce. U.S. Gold futures for August delivered gained 1.5%, to $4,532.80. The dollar and bond yields have been pushed up by reports of a?deal for a ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, according to independent metals trader Tai Wong. This has helped gold hold just above the 200-day moving averge. Israel and Lebanon announced late on Wednesday that they had agreed to implement ceasefire. This raised hopes for a possible deal between Washington?and Tehran. The news prompted oil prices to drop by more than 3% amid hopes of a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Dollars fell by 0.3% making greenback bullion cheaper for holders of other currencies. Lower yields on U.S. Treasuries including the 10-year bond also boosted gold's appeal. Wong stated that "record highs in gold for this year are unlikely until we have a lasting, clean ceasefire with Iran, which opens Hormuz and allows energy prices to fall, as well as markets not worrying about possible higher rates." Gold, the traditional safe-haven, reached a record of $5,594.82 an ounce on January 29. Since the start of the Iran conflict, in late February, it has fallen by 16%. Interest rates are high and this weighs on bullion that does not yield. Investors will now be focusing their attention on the U.S. Employment Report for May, which is due to be released this Friday. The data may shed a little?light on?the health of the?labor market, which can help to?guide Federal Reserve's future policy. Spot silver increased 3.1% to $74.96 an ounce. Platinum gained 1.9%, reaching $1,895.29. Palladium rose 1.6%, to $1.322.01. (Reporting by Anjana Anil in Bengaluru; Editing by Paul Simao)
-
Mozambique tightens its grip on mining by imposing a 15% stake for the state and local processing
Mozambique’s President Daniel Chapo?signed a law requiring 15% state ownership in?all mining and processing ventures, tightening its control over resources at a time when demand for battery materials is growing. Mozambique ranks third in the world for graphite production, which is used to make batteries and energy storage systems. According to a government notice from June 3, the mining law approved by Parliament in may aims to improve Mozambique’s “management of strategic resource in defence of national interest”. The new law, which was seen on Thursday, states that the state will have a minimum participation of 15 percent, "free and non-dilutable", in all mining projects. The 'new rules' did not apply immediately to existing mines that are covered by long-term contracts. The Mines Ministry was not available for immediate comment. Mozambique joins a growing list of African nations, such as Zimbabwe, the continent's top producer of lithium, and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the world's largest producer of?cobalt and a major copper supplier to the global market, who are tightening their control over raw commodity exports in order to gain greater economic benefits from their resources. Syrah's Balama operations in the north of the nation, Mozambique, has a graphite deposit that is one of the largest in the world. According to the U.S. Geological Survey China and Madagascar are two of the world's top graphite producers. Rio Tinto and Brazil's Vale owned significant coal assets in Mozambique, including the?world's biggest ruby mine?, Montepuez. The new regulations prohibit the export of semi-processed or unprocessed minerals, unless they are covered by an approved plan to process them locally, and are covered by specific ministerial authorization. Reporting by Custodio Cosse and Manuel Mucari; Writing by Nelson Banya, Editing by Elaine Hardcastle
Was the US attack on a Venezuelan vessel, which resulted in the death of a man, legal?
On Tuesday, the U.S. Military killed 11 people on a vessel that was in the Caribbean. President Donald Trump claimed that the vessel carried illegal drugs and belonged to the drug cartel that he had designated as a terrorist group responsible for killings in the United States.
Here is an overview of the legal basis for the attack.
PRESIDENTIAL POWER OF USE OF MILITARY
According to the Constitution, Congress has the power to declare a war, but it is the president who is in charge of the armed services. Presidents from both parties have carried out military operations overseas without the approval of Congress.
According to a memo from the Office of Legal Counsel that provides advice to Presidents, presidents have justified limited military force when it was in national interest and wasn't restricted or war-like.
WHERE THE ATTACK PERMITTED BY US LAW
Presidents generally order attacks against enemy combatants or terrorist groups such as al Qaeda, or militants like the Houthis, who attacked U.S. ships in Yemen.
The use of military forces in Tuesday's assault is a first. Trump claimed in a post on social media that the boat was carrying illegal drugs, and it would be the U.S. Coast Guard's responsibility to intercept them. Legal experts say that if the Coast Guard was fired on when they tried to stop the boat, then the Coast Guard would have been justified in defending itself.
Trump however posted on social media a video that appeared to show an air strike destroying a boat speeding by. The administration failed to provide any proof that the United States were under imminent attack, or that the vessel was armed. They also did not identify the targets of the terror attack on the boat, as previous presidents did in similar attacks. Trump's claim that the Tren de Aragua cartel was operating the boat does not mean the drug cartel is at war with America in the same manner as other terror organizations, such as al Qaeda.
Legal experts say that many people will see the attack as extrajudicial murder because the victims on the boat are civilians.
What about international law?
In order to achieve international peace and stability, the Charter of the United Nations requires that members refrain from using or threatening force against other nations. The charter recognizes that member states have a right to self-defense. Trump claimed that Tren de Aragua, which is under Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's control, was controlled by the United States.
Legal experts say that this does not meet international law, as there is no evidence of an imminent attack by Tren de Aragua or of past attacks. Venezuelan officials also denied that the group was active in Venezuela. International law is still a subject of debate for legal experts, who said that the right to self-defense in relation to non-state actors was a controversial issue.
Officials in the Trump administration said that the vessel was located in international waters. However, if the vessel had been flagged by a country then the attack would have occurred within its territory. This would be a major escalation. Officials from the administration have not confirmed if this vessel is flagged.
Who can challenge the legality of an attack?
Some opponents may not challenge the attack, given that Venezuela's government and Tren de aragua have been declared international pariahs. Pentagon officials said that this could change if there are more attacks.
Members of Congress criticized the attack, and lawmakers placed limits on the use of force by the president. In recent decades, Congress has ceded its war-making powers to the president.
The legal challenges to the authority of the president to execute the strike in the U.S. courts will probably face high hurdles. U.S. court generally defers to the president in matters of foreign affairs and security.
Families of victims could bring civil lawsuits in the United States for damages, but it would take years and be very expensive. Legally, such attacks carry the risk that the government will kill an American. Anwar al Awlaki was a U.S. born al Qaeda militant. The Obama administration claimed it had the right to kill him because he posed a continuing imminent threat. U.S. lawsuits were filed after the deadly drone strike. The attack can be challenged before an international tribunal such as the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. This has led some countries to acknowledge past abuses, even though the United States was not a member of the court.
Legal experts say that while the attack may not result in successful legal challenges, Washington's international relations could be soured and it would become more difficult to work with other countries to implement drug and immigration policies.
(source: Reuters)