Latest News

US oil refinery trade group writes to Trump about his biofuel and tariff policies

In a letter sent to Republican legislators, a leading U.S. refinery trade group criticized the Trump Administration's biofuel policy. This is the biggest disagreement between the oil industry and the president since he returned to the White House.

The letter, dated July 25, from the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), seen by also reflects an increasing divide between U.S. refiners and oil producers, an alliance which has been fractured over recent years due to biofuels policies.

ExxonMobil, Chevron and other integrated oil companies have invested large sums of money in biofuel production. Independent refiners such as PBF Energy and CVR Energy are complaining that the policy is too farm-friendly and has led to high costs and a threat to their plants.

In a letter to House of Representatives speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Republican Leader John Thune, it was stated that current energy policies would negatively impact U.S. oil refining companies, consumers and the "energy dominance" agenda of President Donald Trump.

According to the letter, compliance costs for the federal rule will be around $70 billion if the Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to increase biofuels in the fuel blend that oil refiners are required to use is implemented. The letter said that a new section of the proposal, which reduces the value imported biofuel feedstocks, will also increase compliance costs.

Oil refiners and U.S. Farmers have been at odds over the federal mandates for biofuels. The oil industry is concerned about cost and infrastructure, and farmers are pushing for higher quotas.

The letter also criticized EPA’s handling of waivers granted to small refiners, which exempted them from biofuel blending requirements; EPA’s decision to temporarily allow nationwide sales of gasoline with a greater ethanol content during summertime; and tariffs imposed on imported renewable feedstocks.

We understand that some of these policies are intended to promote the biofuel and agriculture industries in the United States, which is what the above clearly aims for. These policies shouldn't come at the expense the U.S. consumer and the domestic refining industries, said AFPM President Chet Thompson in the letter.

Since 2010, the U.S. oil refinery industry has been struggling due to the rising fuel efficiency of vehicles, the introduction of electric cars, and the economic impact of the COVID-19 epidemic.

According to the Energy Information Administration, this has led to a stagnation in industry capacity, which is now a little more than 18 million barrels per day.

Two major refineries, including the Phillips 66 plant at Wilmington and the Valero refining facility in Benicia, are scheduled to close in the coming months. This will reduce the state's production capacity by almost 300,000 bpd.

"AFPM is deeply concerned about the federal biofuel policy, and in particular with the RFS proposal." An AFPM spokesperson responded to the story by saying that they hope to discuss these issues with both the administration and Congress. Reporting by Jarrett Renshaw, Stephanie Kelly, and Howard Goller; editing by Chizui nomiyama.

(source: Reuters)