Latest News

Sources say that US-led peace negotiations could increase Rwandan processing Congo minerals

Sources say that US-led peace negotiations could increase Rwandan processing Congo minerals

Three sources said that Congolese minerals, such as tungsten tantalum, and tin which Kinshasa accuses Rwanda of exploiting illegally, could be legitimately exported to Rwanda under the terms of the peace deal being negotiated between the U.S.

Kinshasa sees the pillage of its mineral wealth in eastern Congo as the key driver for the conflict between their forces and the Rwanda-backed M23 rebellions that has intensified ever since January. Kinshasa accuses Kigali smuggling over the border tens or millions of dollars of minerals each month, to be sold by Rwanda.

Massad Boulos told the media earlier this month that Washington wants a peace deal between the two parties to be signed by the end of the summer. This agreement will also include mineral deals aimed at bringing Western investment worth billions of dollars to the region.

He told X last weekend that the U.S. provided a first draft of a contract to both sides. However, its content has not been revealed.

According to two diplomatic sources, and one U.N. official briefed on the matter by U.S. officials, the negotiations may lead to the refinement and marketing of minerals from what is now artisanal mine zones in eastern Congo from Rwanda.

One of the diplomats stated that "their (Washington) point of views is simple: if Rwanda can legitimately profit from Congo's mineral through processing, then it will be less inclined to occupy and plunder their neighbour's minerals."

"Industrialization for Congo would increase revenues, improve the traceability and combat the armed group that lives off the miner's wages."

The foreign ministry did not answer questions posed by a government spokesperson from Congo. It has been long-established that the country wants to shift away from raw exports to local processing.

Unnamed Congolese official said that no cooperation in minerals would be possible without the withdrawal by Rwandan troops, and "their proxy", which is a reference to M23. M23 controls more territory now than ever before in eastern Congo. The official added that Rwanda must also respect "our sovereignty, which includes our minerals." The negotiations may bring Rwanda a large inflow of money that will help clean up a sector of the economy that has been largely illegal. For its part, the U.S. would be able secure deeper access for itself and allies to Congolese minerals assets, which are dominated by China. In a statement released by the U.S. State Department, a spokesperson stated that Congo and Rwanda, in a joint declaration signed last month in Washington, had committed to creating transparent, formalized and licit end to end mineral value chains that linked both countries. investors."

Boulos said last week that U.S. representatives had spoken with "probably 30" U.S. companies about "doing businesses in Rwanda in mining," including downstream processing.

Separately, he said that the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (an agency tasked with mobilising capital for U.S. national security and foreign policy goals by offering debt financing) would "provide full assistance on these transactions and investment".

Companies that take the plunge in this region are at risk of losing money due to the long history and violence of the area.

HEART CAUSES

Sources said that the minerals projects will not stop a conflict which dates back to the Rwandan genocide of 1994.

A mining agreement will not bring peace. Another diplomat stated that these projects would take three, five, or ten years. There are immediate issues and root causes which need to be addressed.

Congo, the U.N., and the U.S. accuse Rwanda repeatedly of profiting illegally from the exploitation of Congolese minerals resources. Kigali strongly denies these allegations.

Four years ago, an attempt to promote deeper official mining collaboration between Rwanda and Congo failed.

In June 2021 the two sides signed a memorandum relating to the joint exploitation of Congolese Gold by state-owned Sakima, and private Rwandan company Dither.

Kinshasa, however, suspended the agreement in June 2022 citing Rwanda’s alleged support for M23 as well as the rebel group’s capture of Bunagana, the strategic border city.

Rwanda has denied supporting M23, but acknowledged deploying "defensive actions" in eastern Congo to combat Rwandan Hutu militas. Analysts claim that the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (DFLR), the group most often cited, is no longer a serious threat.

According to a diplomatic source, Kinshasa was not seen as a trustworthy negotiating partner by Kigali. They said that the collapse of Sakima's deal was a concern for Rwandan officials.

William Millman is an independent consultant in the tantalum and niobium industries who has visited both mines.

"So, unless you have somebody with a large club, like the United States of America, they won't honour agreements." Reporting by Sonia Rolley and Daphne Psaledakis, both in Paris; Additional reporting from Andrew Mills and Jan Harvey in Doha.

(source: Reuters)