Latest News
-
Gold continues to rise on the back of a weaker dollar, but Iran remains in focus
The 'U.S. dollar' fell, and gold rose for the fourth?straight?session? to a?peak? of nearly two weeks on Wednesday. Dollar?slid, as traders focused on the Middle East war and its implications for the global monetary policies. Gold spot was up 1.3% at $4,728.75 an ounce by 1300 GMT after reaching its highest level since the 19th of March earlier in session. U.S. Gold Futures rose 1.7% to $4.755.70. The U.S. dollar fell for the second day in a row, making bullion priced in greenbacks more appealing to holders of foreign currencies. Bob Haberkorn is a senior market analyst at RJO Futures. He said that if the U.S. dollar continues to fall, gold prices could rise above $5,000 an ounce. Rate-cutting expectations may creep back into the market. He added that the focus was on Iran and Strait of Hormuz - "how this conflict develops and what the future looks like." U.S. president Donald Trump stated in a Truth Social posting that Iran's new leader has asked for a ceasefire from the U.S. "We will reconsider when the Hormuz Strait opens, is free and clear." "We are blasting Iran to oblivion until then," he said. Spot gold dropped more than 11% during March, as the Iran war and higher energy prices stoked inflation fears. This led to a reduction in expectations of looser monetary policies. Bullion is often seen as a safe haven during times of geopolitical unrest and inflation. However, high interest rates can reduce the appeal of this non-yielding material. The end of the conflict may prove to be a double-edged blade (for gold). Tony Sycamore, IG's market analyst, said that a lasting peace accord would eliminate the geopolitical safe haven bid which supported gold prices prior to the conflict. Sycamore said that lower oil prices and an easing of inflation could also revive expectations for Fed cuts in 2026. The ADP's National Employment Report showed that private payrolls in the United States increased steadily during March. Retail sales in the U.S. rose strongly in February. However, the rising gasoline prices caused by the war may have an impact on spending in the coming months. Spot silver dropped 0.5% per ounce to $74.70, platinum fell 0.3% to 1,942.80, and palladium eased by 0.8% to 1,464.88. (Reporting and editing by Paul Simao in Bengaluru, Ashitha Shivaprasad from Bengaluru)
-
Argentina delays fuel tax increases in order to reduce the impact of global prices pressures
In a Wednesday decree, the Argentine government announced that it would delay the implementation of tax increases scheduled for liquid fuels, carbon dioxide and other pollutants. This was done in response to the global instability brought about by the U.S./Israeli war on Iran. The decree stated that the move was intended to "support economic growth by sustainable fiscal measures". The decree also stated that the measure would delay the anticipated?tax increase on liquid fuels, carbon dioxide, and other gases for a month, to the end of April. The decree added that this is the second step taken by President Javier Milei in recent days to combat the 'energy price disruptions' caused by the conflict. On?Friday the government relaxed some gasoline quality standards. Local refiners can now blend up to 15 percent ethanol in gasoline to reduce their dependence on petroleum. Analysts warn that rising fuel prices could affect consumer and transport prices. Official data show that Argentina's inflation rate remained stable in February but was still?above expectation due to sharp increases in housing prices, including rent and utility costs. Private analysts had already increased their 'inflation forecasts' for 2026 prior to a surge in crude oil prices late February. Regional Responses Other countries in Latin America are also taking steps to deal with the uncertainty caused by the conflict in the Middle East. Colombia's policymakers raised the benchmark interest rate by 100 basis points on Tuesday to combat inflationary pressures. Chile's central banks minutes show that they briefly considered raising interest rates during their March meeting, whereas Mexico has reached an agreement with gas stations to limit fuel costs, according to the President Claudia Sheinbaum.
-
Are central banks selling Treasuries to the public? McGeever
Are central banks selling Treasuries in the midst of the controversial U.S. war in "the Middle East"? It's likely yes, but the situation is complex. The foreign Treasuries in the custody of the New York Federal Reserve have just fallen to their lowest level in 16 years, below $3 trillion. This indicates that foreign central banks are dumping assets at a 'increasingly fast pace. The decline in Fed "custody' holdings, as I wrote last Monday, has been eye-catching. Deutsche Bank strategists estimate the $75 billion drop in the four-week period ending March 19, pointed to $60 billion net selling by central bankers. This would be some of the most aggressive sales ever. The official U.S. Treasury International Capital figures - which are the gold standard data for foreign holdings in U.S. Treasuries – show that central bank sales abroad were minimal last year, but that net purchases were the highest in 13 years in January. What is it then? Selling or shifting? Fed custody data can be a good proxy for foreign central bankers and their treasuries but it is not perfect. The vast majority of the custody holdings are foreign central banks, but they also include quasi-official agencies like sovereign wealth funds or multilateral agencies. Fed custody changes don't always reflect the amount or if central banks are actually buying or selling. Custody holdings, for example, fell by $238 billion in the last year. This suggests central banks are dumping U.S. debt at a breakneck pace. Official TIC data revealed that the net sales by foreign central banks of Treasury notes and bonds last year were only $34 billion. This is less than 1% of the $3.5 trillion in their vault. How can we square this? Changes in exchange rates and bond prices can explain changes in custody data. Some of the "selling", however, can be explained by central banks moving their holdings from U.S. jurisdictions to other parts of their network or non-U.S. jurisdictions. Brad Setser, of the Council on Foreign Relations, has long argued that the recent decline of China's holdings in Treasuries is due to the fact Beijing has funneled vast amounts of foreign assets into its state-owned banks. China's actual holdings are likely to be much higher than what the official figures suggest. Footprints shrinking at nominal highs The official TIC data will be released in May, and we'll know if central banks sold in March. The decline in custody holdings and the weak foreign demand for recent Treasury auctions as well as the falling bond prices suggest that they did. It's still worth remembering that the latest official TIC data, released in mid-March, showed that foreign central bank bought a total of $50.6 billion in Treasuries during January. It was a rare instance where the official demand was higher than private-sector demands. This was also the second largest monthly purchase by central banks in 13 years. In recent years, the private sector has been an important buyer of U.S. In recent years, investors have been a major buyer of?U.S. Treasuries. Foreign ownership of Treasuries is at an all-time high. In the last year, foreign investors owned $9.23 trillion in U.S. government bonds, including $7.78 trillion in bonds and notes and $1.45 billion of bills. All of these are record highs. As a percentage of all Treasuries, foreign ownership has been declining. Morgan Stanley analysts claim that in the fourth quarter last year it dropped to 32%. This is the lowest level since 1997. Central?banks likely sell Treasuries at a margin, not in large?size. It's not yet. You like this column? Open Interest (ROI) is your new essential source of global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. Listen to the Morning Bid podcast daily on Apple, Spotify or the app. Subscribe to the Morning Bid podcast and hear journalists discussing the latest news in finance and markets seven days a weeks.
-
Preliminary data indicates that South Africa's tax revenue increased by 8% in the last fiscal year
Preliminary figures released on Wednesday showed that South Africa collected net tax of 2.01 trillion Rand ($119.73 Billion) in the fiscal period that ended on March 31. This was 8.4% more than the previous year. SARS (South African Revenue Service) reported that the amount collected was 24 billion rands higher than the budgeted amount for 2025. In a statement, the agency stated that the increased collection reflected its focus of compliance initiatives, improved efficiencies?and contribution from the mining sector. The statement said that "these results were achieved despite the challenges of a sluggish economic, geopolitical conflicts, global supply-chain interruptions, and proliferation of the illegal economy." Edward Kieswetter, SARS commissioner, said at a press briefing that the mining sector contributed about 5 billion dollars of the 24.7 billion collected. SARS expects to collect about 2,13 trillion rand for the fiscal year 2026/27, which begins on April 1. This represents a 5.8% rise. SARS stated that South Africa's trade was very minimal with Israel and Iran, but shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz might have a major impact on imports of petroleum products. A presentation showed that more than 70% of the refined petroleum imported in 2025 would come from the Middle East. Oman (26%) and Saudi Arabia (16%) are the countries that send the most refined petroleum to South Africa. The United Arab Emirates (15%) is also a top exporter. Johnstone Makhubu, Deputy Commissioner of Customs in Oman, said that imports were not at risk because the country is located at the exit of the Strait of Hormuz. Nigeria and Angola accounted for more than half of South Africa's crude imports in the past year.
-
Retail sales in the US increased by a solid amount in February
Retail sales in the U.S. increased in February, as motor vehicle purchases rebounded. Temperatures also warmed. However, rising gasoline prices due to the war in the Middle East may?cripple spending in upcoming months. The Commerce Department's Census Bureau reported on Wednesday that retail?sales increased 0.6% following a 0.1% decline in January. The economists polled had predicted that retail sales (which are mainly goods and not adjusted for inflation) would rise 0.5% following a 0.2% decline in January. After the government shutdown last year, the?Census Bureau has yet to release data. U.S./Israeli conflict with Iran pushed global oil prices up more than?50%. The national average retail price of gasoline topped $4 a gallon for the first time in over three years. Some worry that rising gasoline prices could reduce the expected boost in consumer spending and overall economic growth from tax reductions. The conflict that lasted a month has also?reduced the household net worth. In March, both the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average posted their largest?monthly drop in a very long time. Wealthier households are driving consumer spending. Retail sales, excluding automobiles and gasoline, building supplies, food, and other services, increased by 0.5% in February, after increasing by 0.2% in January. These core retail sales are the closest to the consumer spending component in gross domestic product. Consumer spending declined in the fourth quarter. This helped to slow GDP growth down to 0.7% on an annualized basis. The third quarter saw the economy grow at a rate of 4.4%. (Reporting and editing by Chizu Nomiyama; Lucia Mutikani)
-
Copper reaches two-week high amid hopes of a quick end to the Iran war
The copper price rose on Wednesday, reaching its highest level in the past two weeks amid hopes that the Iran war may be nearing an end. Open-outcry official trading on the London Metal Exchange saw benchmark three-month copper rise 0.2% to a metric ton of $12,365 after hitting $12,492.50 - its highest level since March 18. This was copper's fourth consecutive session of gains. However, it is still far below the record high of $14,527.50 that was reached on January 29, 2017. Ole Hansen is the head of commodity strategy for Saxo Bank, Copenhagen. "The market wants us to believe we are getting closer to a resolution to this escalation even though economic clouds still hang over?the?markets, which are grey and could worsen," he said. After President Donald Trump announced that the end of the war against Iran may be near, copper prices rose along with other financial markets. The most active copper contract at the Shanghai Futures Exchange rose 1.5%, to 97.030 yuan (14,093.57) per tonne, after a jump to 97.250 yuan, the highest price since March 19. The metals market also received a boost on Wednesday from data showing that the manufacturing sector of China, the world's largest consumer of metals, expanded for a 4th consecutive month in March. This came after an official survey showed that activity had grown at the fastest rate in a whole year. The physical demand for copper is increasing as evidenced by the higher premiums and declining Chinese inventories. Stocks monitored by SHFE The number of tons in the market fell for a second week in a row to 359 135 tonnes as of March 27, 2019. Hansen said that this indicates that there was pent up demand, and that lower prices we achieved earlier in the month did prompt some buying. A weaker dollar also helped metals gain. Dollar, which makes commodities backed by greenbacks more affordable to investors who use other currencies. LME Aluminium initially dropped as investors believed that the supply problems from smelters in the Gulf would be resolved if war ended. Prices jumped 1.6% to $3,523 per ton in official activity after a consultant said that one major smelter ceased operations and another was only operating at 30%. Other metals include LME Zinc, which rose 0.4% to $3240 per ton. Lead gained 1.3%, nickel grew 0.7%, and tin increased 2.1%, to $47745.
-
Dollar drops as gold nears 2-week-high amid hopes of an end to the Iran war
On Wednesday, gold was near a two-week-high - after a month that saw its largest monthly loss for nearly 17 years. The U.S. Dollar and Treasury yields fell on signs of a de-escalation of the war against Iran. Gold spot was up 1.8% to $4,755.50 an ounce at 1159 GMT after rising by 2% earlier, reaching its highest level since the 19th of March. U.S. gold futures for delivery in April rose 2.3% to $4.783.50. Donald Trump, the U.S. president and Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State of the United States have both said that the end of war against Iran is near. This could mean direct talks with Tehran or a winding-down of the conflict without a deal. Trump will give an update on Iran at 9pm EDT on Tuesday (0100 GMT Thursday). "We have seen a positive reaction to another Donald Trump statement... The U.S. Dollar Index has weakened, and the euro is stronger against the dollar. Futures for bonds and interest rate cuts are also up, which indicates that the opportunity cost to hold gold has decreased," said Quantitative commodity Research analyst Peter Fertig. Gold priced in greenbacks is now less expensive for those who hold other currencies. Benchmark yields on 10-year U.S. Treasury notes fell to a two-week low. Gold prices fell by more than 11% during March, the steepest monthly drop since October 2008. The surge in oil prices has fueled inflation concerns. Gold is often used to hedge inflation and geopolitical risk, but expectations of a hawkish response from the monetary authorities have made non-yielding gold 'less attractive' among investors. Fertig said that the market has shifted its narrative on gold as a safe-haven at times. If it's more about inflation, then both gold and equities could suffer because the markets fear central banks will be forced to halt interest rates in the Fed case. Palladium rose 0.6% to $1,485.45, while platinum rose 1.4% to $1976.82. (Reporting by Ishaan Arora in Bengaluru; Editing by Arun Koyyur)
-
Fed's Barkin says households and firms still view oil shocks through a "short term lens"
Tom Barkin, Richmond Federal Reserve Bank president, said that businesses continue to believe high oil prices are only a temporary disruption. There is little evidence yet to suggest they have caused consumers to cut back on their spending or changed public expectations of inflation in an alarming way. Barkin said on Tuesday that he had a "short-term" view of the situation based on his weekly credit card spending data and his conversations with executives on pricing, investments and other topics. "Gas expenditure is up, but other spending looks healthy," said Barkin. Barkin is not voting on interest rate policy for this year. If you think that this will only last for a few weeks, then an additional $10 to $15 won't make a big difference in your lifestyle. If you believe this will last a long period of time, I think that you are more likely to experience a pullback. Fed officials and central banks worldwide have responded to the U.S. Airstrikes on Iran and the subsequent surge in global oil price with equal parts patience and concern. They are concerned that sustained high energy costs could increase inflation, which they are trying to contain. And they're also patient against overreacting, until it's clear how long this conflict will last and what impact the prices may be. At its latest meeting, the Fed held the interest rate policy steady at the current range of 3.50% - 3.75%. Policymakers are still projecting that a quarter point rate reduction will be made by the end the year. The situation is uncertain. The potential for a quick change was evident this week, when Brent crude oil, the benchmark, briefly reached $119 per barrel, which is more than 70% above the price before the U.S. began bombing. It then dropped to $102 per barrel after President Donald Trump said that the U.S. war campaign could be coming to an end. He will address the nation on Wednesday night. According to AAA, gas prices jumped on Wednesday, reaching a national median of $4.06 - the highest level since summer 2022 when a combination?of supply shocks from the pandemic era and strong consumer demand caused the 'worst inflation surge in 40 years. Fed officials want to avoid a repeat. The oil boom prompted some investors to believe that the Fed will begin raising interest rates in this year, rather than resuming rate reductions as was expected. Barkin said that there are many scenarios that can push the Fed either way at this time, but he believes that a rise of inflation expectations would be the most likely to cause a rate hike. He said that the hike would be based on inflation expectations finally moving. "I do not have the impression that they are breaking out at this stage." In contrast, the case for rate cuts would be either a rapid return of inflation to the Fed's target of 2% from a point or two above it now, OR a weakening job market which required support through rate reductions. Prices are lower for goods than services The employment report due on Friday will be closely watched to determine if February's job losses were an anomaly, or a sign that weakness was developing. In the absence of this, the Fed could be 'left on hold', and inflation is expected to only make a halting advance towards the central banks target in 2018. This is due to the successive price shocks that Trump has brought about, starting with the tariffs, then continuing with the oil. Barkin, in his discussions with executives, said he has seen a growing split between the goods sector where retailers believe their pricing power is being?limited by consumers' pushback, and the services sector where firms catering to more affluent households feel freer to increase prices. He said that after talking to a retailer who focuses on customers with low-to-moderate incomes, "I got the feeling that consumers were exhausted by price hikes." "They are pushing back." "I walked out with a lens that 1%-2% (of price hikes) would be about the amount they could handle." He said that the?vulnerability was more on the service side, and in particular selling to high-end clients. Barkin stated that "goods suppliers have been through this drill many times, trying to pass along tariffs and oil shock costs. They just feel they don't have much left," Barkin. "I do not have the same feeling about services." Barkin believes that the Fed will likely take a longer time to reach its inflation target. This is reflected in the market's expectations, which no longer include rate hikes. "I see a gradual path, not a quick path. It's just my instinct. Reporting by Howard Schneider, Editing by Dan Burns & Chizu Nomiyama
Unknown trust links India's leading services with Modi's election war chest
Behind the doors of a. little, nondescript workplace in the heart of New Delhi lies the. head office of an electoral trust run by simply two guys that is. the largestknown donor to India's judgment Bharatiya Janata Celebration. ( BJP), according to a review of public records. The Prudent Electoral Trust has raised $272 million because its. development in 2013, funnelling roughly 75% of that to Prime. Minister Narendra Modi's party. The trust's contributions to the BJP. overall 10 times as much as the $20.6 million it issued to the. opposition Congress party, the records reveal.
The previous Congress-led federal government introduced electoral. trusts in 2013 to permit tax-exempt contribution to celebrations. It stated the mechanism would make campaign financing more. transparent by decreasing money contributions, which are more difficult to. trace. However some election specialists say the trusts contribute to opacity. around the financing of political celebrations in India, where this. year's general election-- due to be called within weeks-- is. anticipated to return Modi to power for a rare 3rd term, surveys. predict.
While Prudent does not disclose how contributions made by. private corporate donors are distributed, used public. records from 2018 to 2023 to track flows from some of India's. largest business.
Eight of India's most significant company groups contributed at least. $ 50 million in total between 2019 and 2023 to the trust, which. then issued cheques for corresponding amounts to the BJP,. according to the analysis.
Four companies whose transactions were determined . - steel huge ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel, telco Bharti. Airtel, facilities designer GMR and energy giant. Essar - have actually not given cash to the party straight and do not. appear on its donors' list.
GMR and Bharti Airtel said in reaction to concerns. that Prudent identifies how their contributions are distributed.
Prudent chooses as per their internal standards, which we. are uninformed of, said a GMR representative. He added that the business. does not like to align with any political party.
Bharti Airtel, which developed Prudent before transferring. control to independent auditors Mukul Goyal and Venkatachalam. Ganesh in 2014, stated it has no impact on the choices,. instructions and mode of disbursal of funds.
Spokespeople for the other groups did not react to calls,. text and e-mails.
Goyal and Ganesh did not respond to concerns sent out via email. and post. When asked on a brief call about how Prudent. functioned, Goyal said: That is something we do not discuss.
Sensible - the largest of India's 18 electoral trusts - is. legally required to state how much it has actually gathered from each. donor and the overall quantities disbursed to each celebration.
But it is the just one amongst India's four biggest electoral. trusts to accept contributions from more than one business. group.
Trusts supply one layer of separation in between companies and. parties, stated Milan Vaishnav, a specialist on Indian campaign. finance at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a. Washington-based think-tank.
Political financing in India is extensively seen as dirty, with. most political contributions in India undisclosed, Vaishnav added. BJP said in its latest public disclosure in March 2023 that its. political war chest - funds it had offered consisting of cash. reserves and possessions - was valued at 70.4 billion rupees ($ 850. million). That offers it a colossal financial advantage over. Congress, which had 7.75 billion rupees in funds.
BJP spokespeople did not react to repeated requests for. remark for this story.
The records show that Prudent was also the largest-known. donor to the Congress celebration in the years to March 2023.
LAYER OF SEPARATION
India's Supreme Court stated in a February project finance. ruling that business contributions are purely service. deals made with the intent of securing benefits in. return.
was not able to develop if political parties know. the identities of donors that give through trusts that get. contributions from several groups.
MV Rajeev Gowda, head of research for Congress, told . that electoral trusts are a semi fig-leaf and that he believed. parties understood the donors' identities. Gowda, who doesn't manage. the celebration's financial resources, didn't supply evidence.
BJP's next largest recognized donor is Tata Group's Progressive. Electoral Trust, which has offered the celebration 3.6 billion rupees. collected from the salt-to-airline conglomerate's companies. Progressive is also Congress's next largest donor, having actually offered. it 655 million rupees.
Progressive's by-laws need it to distribute funds. proportionate to the variety of seats held by each party in. parliament. Sensible has no similar limitations and '. analysis of its contributions found no such pattern.
NEAR-INSTANT TRANSFERS
Trusts are enabled to retain an optimum of 300,000 rupees for. annual business expenses. Remaining funds need to be disbursed in. the fiscal year they were received.
In its analysis of contribution reports filed by Prudent to. electoral authorities, identified 18 transactions. in between 2019 and 2022 in which the 8 corporate groups made. big contributions to the trust. Within days, Sensible released. cheques for the very same total up to BJP.
Before the 18 contributions, which are not extensive of all. the contributions made by the groups to Sensible, the trust did not. have enough funds for the payments to BJP.
Business tied to billionaire L.N. Mittal's ArcelorMittal. group were among Prudent's many respected donors.
On July 12, 2021, for example, ArcelorMittal Design and. Engineering Centre Private Limited provided Sensible a cheque for 500. million rupees ($ 6.03 million). The next day, Sensible issued a. cheque to BJP for the very same amount.
ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India also released 200 million. rupees to Prudent on Nov. 1, 2021, and 500 million rupees on. Nov. 16, 2022. The particular amounts were sent to BJP on Nov. 5,. 2021, and Nov. 17, 2022.
A representative for ArcelorMittal did not react to requests. for remark.
Bharti Airtel, meanwhile, issued 250 million rupees to. Sensible on Jan. 13, 2022 and 150 million rupees on March 25,. 2021. The trust sent out cheques to BJP for those amounts on. Jan. 14, 2023 and March 25, 2021.
And 3 companies in the RP-Sanjiv Goenka group - Haldia. Energy India, Phillips Carbon Black and Crescent Power - cut. cheques for 250 million rupees, 200 million rupees and 50. million rupees on March 15, March 16, and March 19, 2021. respectively. On Mar. 17, BJP received a 450-million-rupee. cheque from Prudent; a 50-million-rupee cheque followed on March. 20.
The RPSG group did not respond to ask for comment.
Contributions from Serum Institute and companies in GMR Group,. DLF Ltd and Essar Group moved to BJP instantly after. Sensible received them.
was unable to identify a similar pattern of funds. being sent out to the trust and transferred to Congress right away. afterwards.
However, found comparable patterns involving two. local parties. Megha Engineering and Infrastructure. transferred 750 million rupees to Prudent across 3. transactions on July 5 and July 6, 2022. The trust issued a. 750-million-rupee cheque on July 7 to Bharat Rashtra Samithi, a. centrist celebration in Telangana state, where Megha group is. headquartered.
And residential or commercial property developers Avinash Bhosale Group, based in the. western Maharashtra state, provided 50 million rupees to Prudent on. Nov. 27, 2020. The trust provided a cheque for that total up to the. Maharashtra Pradesh Nationalist Congress Party, which is. independent of the nationwide Congress celebration, on Nov. 30. The corporate groups did not instantly return ask for. remark. BRS's general secretary said he was not aware of. specifics about the contributions, while a senior NCP official said. that the party had just recently divided and every record will not be. available with us.
REASON FOR CONCERN?
Public records and party reports show BJP's war chest has. swelled given that Modi ended up being prime minister in 2014, from 7.8. billion rupees ($ 94.09 million) in March 2014 to 70.4 billion. rupees in March 2023. Congress' funds increased from 5.38. billion rupees to 7.75 billion rupees in the very same time period. The funding gap between the BJP and Congress is a reason for. concern, stated Jagdeep Chhokar of Association of Democratic. Reforms, a Delhi-based civil society group that was the primary. petitioner behind the electoral bonds difficulty in the Supreme. Court.
Level playing field is an important part of democracy, he. stated.
Some BJP authorities have actually said in the past that the large sums. it has raised on its books are an example of its transparency.
BJP has actually been the significant beneficiary of electoral bonds, a. system that permitted donors to offer unrestricted total up to. parties without public disclosure.
It got some 65.66 billion rupees of the 120.1 billion. rupees worth of such bonds sold between their January 2018. introduction and March 2023. Such bonds made up more than half. the contributions gotten by the BJP in all but one fiscal year. given that their introduction.
The Supreme Court called the system unconstitutional in. February and purchased the government-owned State Bank of India,. which issued the bonds, to launch purchasers' information. Specifics. are set for release by March 15.
(source: Reuters)