Latest News

ICC probes cyberattacks in Ukraine as possible war criminal offenses, sources say

District attorneys at the International Bad guy Court are examining alleged Russian cyberattacks on Ukrainian civilian infrastructure as possible war criminal offenses, four sources familiar with the case have actually informed .

It is the first verification that assaults in the online world are being investigated by worldwide district attorneys, which might lead to jail warrants if enough evidence is gathered.

The probe is taking a look at attacks on infrastructure that threatened lives by disrupting power and water products, cutting connections to emergency responders or knocking out mobile information services that transfer air raid warnings, one official said.

ICC district attorneys are working together with Ukrainian teams to investigate cyberattacks committed from the start of the full-scale intrusion in February 2022, stated the authorities, who declined to be called since the probe is not ended up.

Two other sources close to the ICC district attorney's office validated they were looking into cyberattacks in Ukraine and said they could go back as far as 2015, the year after Russia's. seizure and unilateral annexation of the Crimean Peninsula from. Ukraine.

Moscow has actually formerly rejected that it performs. cyberattacks, and officials have cast such accusations as. attempts to prompt anti-Russian belief.

Ukraine is collecting evidence to support the ICC. district attorney's examination.

The ICC district attorney's workplace declined to comment on Friday,. however has previously said it has jurisdiction to examine. cybercrimes. It has likewise stated it can not talk about matters. associated to continuous examinations.

RUSSIANS IMPLICATED OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANKIND

The court has actually released 4 arrest warrants versus senior. Russian suspects since the beginning of the invasion. These. consist of President Vladimir Putin, thought of a war criminal offense over. the deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia.

Russia, which is not a member of the ICC, dismissed that. decision as null and void. Ukraine is likewise not a member, however. has given the ICC jurisdiction to prosecute criminal activities dedicated. on its area.

In April, a pre-trial chamber released arrest warrants. alleging that 2 Russian leaders had actually dedicated criminal offenses. against humankind with strikes against civilian infrastructure. The Russian defence ministry did not respond to a request for. remark at the time.

At least 4 significant attacks on energy infrastructure are. being taken a look at, two sources with knowledge of the examination. told .

A senior source said one group of Russian hackers in the. ICC's crosshairs is understood in cybersecurity research circles as. Sandworm, and is believed by Ukrainian authorities and cyber. specialists to be connected to Russian military intelligence.

A team at the Human Rights Center, UC Berkeley School of. Law, has been investigating Sandworm's cyberattacks targeting. Ukrainian civilian infrastructure considering that 2021, and made. personal submissions to the ICC in 2022 and 2023 determining. five cyberattacks it said could be charged as war criminal activities.

Sandworm is thought of a string of prominent. attacks, including an effective 2015 attack on a power grid in. western Ukraine-- among the very first of its kind, according to. cybersecurity researchers.

A group of activist hackers calling themselves Solntsepyok. ( hot spot) claimed obligation for a major attack on the. Ukrainian mobile telecommunications company Kyivstar last Dec. 12. Ukrainian security services identified that group as a front. for Sandworm.

Sandworm is also thought by Kyiv to have actually performed. substantial cyberespionage versus Western governments on behalf. of Russia's intelligence companies.

CAN A CYBERATTACK BE A WAR CRIMINAL OFFENSE?

Cyberattacks that target industrial control systems, the. technology that underpins much of the world's industrial. facilities, are uncommon, however Russia is among a little club of. nations that have the means to do so, the cybersecurity. researchers said.

The ICC case, which could set a precedent for international. law, is being carefully followed.

The body of worldwide law covering armed conflict,. enshrined in the Geneva Conventions, bans attacks on civilian. objects, however there is no generally accepted meaning of what. makes up a cyber war crime.

Legal scholars in 2017 drafted a handbook called the Tallinn. Handbook on the application of international law to cyberwarfare. and cyber operations.

But experts interviewed say it is unclear whether. information itself can be thought about the things of an attack prohibited. under global humanitarian law, and whether its. damage, which could be devastating for civilians, can be a. war crime.

If the court takes on this problem, that would produce excellent. clarity for us, stated Professor Michael Schmitt of the. University of Reading, who leads the Tallinn Manual process.

Schmitt thinks that the hack of Kyivstar, owned by the. Dutch business Veon, fulfills the requirements to be specified as a war. criminal activity.

You always look at the foreseeable consequences of your. operation. And, you know, that was a foreseeable effect. that positioned human beings at danger.

Ukraine's intelligence company said it had actually supplied information. of the incident to ICC investigators in The Hague. Kyivstar said. it was evaluating the attack in partnership with international. providers and the SBU, Ukraine's intelligence firm.

(source: Reuters)