Latest News

Indigenous groups ask Chilean court to stop community review of Codelco/SQM lithium deal

Indigenous groups ask Chilean court to stop community review of Codelco/SQM lithium deal

According to documents reviewed by, two indigenous groups in northern Chile asked a local judge to suspend the state-led process of community review that was required to approve a partnership between copper miner Codelco and lithium mining company SQM.

Last week, the Indigenous community of Coyo and Atacameno Association of Irrigators and Farmers of San Pedro de Atacama filed separate legal challenges with the Chilean Appeal Court in the Antofagasta Region. They accused the Chilean Economic Development Agency Corfo of failing to properly conduct a consultation process for their input regarding the partnership.

This is the last condition for the deal that will see state-run Codelco take over SQM's lithium mine operations on the Atacama Salt Flat.

The Coyo Community and the Atacameno Association of Irrigators and Farmers (which has Indigenous members) said that they needed more time and information to give informed consent to the plan.

According to a document filed in court, the Antofagasta Court accepted their challenges on Friday. The court ordered Corfo, to respond within 15 days to the allegations and asked Codelco to comment.

Corfo said that the consultation process is still ongoing.

The agency released a statement saying that the "Indigenous consultation process" with the Atacama Indigenous Organizations is progressing and was carried out according to the regulations.

Codelco refused to comment while SQM didn't immediately respond to a comment request.

The Indigenous Consultation, led by Corfo, and including a few dozen local community groups around the Atacama Salt Flat, was expected to end around late July.

SQM, Codelco and other communities in the vicinity of the salt flats are holding separate talks to discuss a model that will allow Indigenous communities to oversee lithium extraction.

Both the Coyo Community and the Atacameno association of Irrigators & Farmers asked the court for a suspension until a new method to review the community could be implemented and more information was provided.

Both groups claimed that Corfo did not provide enough details about the proposed Codelco-SQM contract and that the timeline of the consultation between November 2024 to July 2025 is too short for a detailed analysis.

The report also stated that Corfo did not always act in good faith and did not adhere to the standards of the International Labour Organization (a U.N. agency).

The Coyo Community said that "this situation directly affects fundamental rights by limiting the Community's influence over decisions affecting its territory, its environmental surroundings, and its collective rights, thus violating constitutional protections," in its court filing. (Reporting and editing by Jamie Freed; Daina Beth Solon)

(source: Reuters)