Latest News

US judge blocks Trump’s freeze on climate and infrastructure grants

The U.S. Judge who blocked President

Donald Trump

On Tuesday, the administration of former president Joe Biden froze billions of dollars of grants that Congress had authorized in two landmark climate investment and infrastructure bills.

U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy issued an injunction in Providence, Rhode Island at the request of environmental groups. They argued that the Trump administration unlawfully frozen funding already awarded for projects to fight climate change, reduce pollutants and modernize U.S. Infrastructure.

The funding was authorized by Congress in accordance with Biden's $1 trillion bill, known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 2021 and the Inflation Reduction Act 2022, his signature climate investment law.

The funding was frozen on Trump's first day in office, January 20, when he signed an executive directive directing agencies not to approve funding under these two laws until a review had been conducted to determine whether the spending supported Trump's policies.

In response to this order, both the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. The Departments of Agriculture, Energy, Interior, and Housing and Urban Development all halted grant funding.

In a lawsuit filed on March 13, the Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council, National Council of Nonprofits, Eastern Rhode Island Conservation District and Green Infrastructure Center argued the agencies lacked authority to unilaterally withhold already-awarded congressionally-authorized funds.

The agencies said they froze the funds despite rulings made by a judge in Rhode Island who, at the request of a group led by Democratic states, had frozen the money.

Blockage

The administration should refrain from implementing a blanket, sweeping freeze on federal grants, loans, and other financial aid totaling $3 trillion.

The Trump administration countered that it had the right to temporarily pause the funding of those who were currently receiving grants in order to decide if they should redirect the funding to another recipient, and the Rhode Island judge did not have jurisdiction to hear the matter.

The U.S. Department of Justice stated that its position had been bolstered following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in A

5-4 ruling

On April 4, the Trump administration cleared the way to end millions of dollars of teacher training grants in its crackdown on diversity equity and inclusion initiatives.

(source: Reuters)