Latest News

US court rejects EPA's bid to relax regulations for coal-fired electricity plants

A?U.S. A federal appeals court rejected Friday the bid by the Environmental Protection Agency to remove Biden-era pollution limits for soot from coal-fired factories and power plants. This was a "setback" for the Trump administrations efforts at deregulatory. Last year, the EPA under Donald Trump asked the court to invalidate its 2024 rule. The agency claimed that it had acted unreasonable by not taking into account costs when setting the standard.

The court rejected the petition and left in place the annual limit for fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) of 9 micrograms/cubic meter.

The EPA, after initially defending its new rule, now wants to void it on the grounds that the EPA exceeded its statutory powers and acted unreasonable by not considering costs. We reject the petitions for review and motions for vacatur because these arguments are 'feasible.

Under Biden, the EPA had stated that tighter limits could prevent more than 800,000. This included 2,000 hospitalizations and 4,500 premature death. The Trump EPA, however, has stated that the '2024 rule would cost "hundreds of million dollars if not billions" to American citizens if it were to be implemented and is based 'not on a complete review of the available science. The EPA said on Friday that it was reviewing the decision.

Environmental groups called Trump's attempt to rollback the rule an egregious?retreat away from important public health protections. The Natural Resources Defence Council praised the court's decision. The environmental group stated that while the Trump EPA dragged their feet, millions of Americans continued to breathe unhealthy?levels soot - pollution which'science shows there is no safe level. This decision eliminates all doubt: The science has been clear for a long time, and the law now reflects that. (Reporting and editing by Sanjeev Mglani; Valerie Volcovici and David Shepardson)

(source: Reuters)