Latest News

SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion price tag: An unconventional rationale

Wall Street uses some unconventional yardsticks in order to value 'Elon Musk’s SpaceX. One of SpaceX's largest institutional investors benchmarks the rocket and satellite firm not against aerospace competitors like Boeing or telecom titans like AT&T but against AI infrastructure players like GE Vernova, Vertiv and Palantir Technologies in a bid justify a $1.75 billion valuation ahead of the biggest IPO ever.

A source familiar with SpaceX's thinking described the framework to me?for the very first time. It illustrates the unusual challenge of valuing a company without obvious public competitors - and how far Wall Street will go to justify a premium valuation. SpaceX filed for a U.S. IPO in secret, according to a report last week. As previously reported, the company will hold an analyst's day on April 21. SpaceX's potential $1.75 trillion valuation is expensive by most traditional measures. This includes comparisons with the earnings and revenues multiples of firms that are often used as references for its business. Boeing and Lockheed Martin's joint venture United Launch Alliance, which competes with SpaceX for launch services, are the peers in space. AT&T, Verizon and other internet service providers would be the peers in this case.

Financial backers of SpaceX, which is on track to raise 75 billion dollars in an IPO in this year, argue that comparisons with established firms in legacy industries miss the point. They say SpaceX and Musk's other companies are positioned to benefit from long-term "secular economic shifts" at a time where few competitors have the ability to do so.

Musk's companies are known to command high multiples, in part due to?investors betting on him personally. Tesla is the most obvious example. And SpaceX investors anticipate that this dynamic will carry through into any public offering.

SpaceX CFO Bret Johnson told IPO banks on a recent conference call that it was "pretty exciting" to be able to sell into the "largest total addressable market" in human history - a $370 billion potential space business. According to the sources, Bret Johnsen estimated the market potential for Starlink's internet service as $1.6 trillion.

SpaceX has not responded to a comment request.

RETHINKING COMPARABLES

The fierce debate about the price of SpaceX's massive IPO is centered on finding the right comparables. Bankers and investors are struggling to determine the value of the company, despite the fact that there are few or no closely comparable public counterparts.

Investors and bankers often sort comparables by industry, based on the assumption that this is a good way to measure financial risk and opportunity. Many investors believe that companies need not be in the same sector to be comparable. They say it is more important for them to compare cash flow, growth and risk profiles. According to this approach, a better comparison is made with companies that are selling into AI data-center buildsout. These companies have been famously rewarded by rising share prices and high multiples.

Jay Bala said that the?calculus for smaller funds is different. AIP in Toronto manages assets of?approximately $100 million, with a significant portion concentrated in SpaceX. "I am piggybacking the biggest funds in the universe. Due diligence has been carried out in great detail. "I'm not going second-guess the world's biggest investors," he said. He admitted that it was difficult to get detailed financial information on SpaceX. "You only can get so much." Sometimes it's difficult to get numbers.

STARLINK VERSUS STAR TELECOMS

Starlink, or what SpaceX refers to as its "connectivity business", is compared with legacy telecom companies. However, some investors claim that these comparisons have been skewed due to aging infrastructure, saturated markets in the United States, and years of modest revenue growth.

I wouldn't consider AT&T or Verizon to be very relevant for the Starlink economic model, even though both companies are in the business to provide communication, said a senior executive from one of SpaceX’s largest institutional investors, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the work was confidential.

Palantir is a better choice for SpaceX investors because of its high returns on capital invested, good margins, and asset-light structure. These qualities, say fans, justify the high multiples that the stock commands, and indicate greater opportunities in the future.

Palantir, a well-known stock in the market that trades at 43 times revenue expectations and 75 times earnings, is known for being one of the most expensive stocks. Skeptics claim that these levels are unsustainable. However, SpaceX supporters say that they are achievable if backed up by exceptional financial performance.

According to PitchBook, Palantir, with a market cap of $1.75 trillion would still be cheaper than SpaceX on these measures, as it would trade at 110x revenue estimates for 2025.

"Investors should size positions with the understanding that they are paying a platform premium today for infrastructure-monopoly economics tomorrow," PitchBook analyst Franco Granda said in a note ?last month.

ROCKET MANUFACTURING COMPARISONS

SpaceX investors argue that for the rocket manufacturing part of the business, the firm's achievements - such as the fact it built a reusable system, drove down unit costs drastically and expanded into a market where the demand for launch capability continues to grow - demand valuations much higher than those at Lockheed. Lockheed traded recently for around 20 times the expected earnings for next year. Boeing's high multiples reflect the fact that it is a?turnaround story.

They instead turn to industrial names like GE Vernova or Vertiv whose stock has soared due to AI data-center expenditure, arguing that SpaceX launch operations should be re-rated to "picks-and-shovels" in the data-center era.

These preferred comps are not very similar to SpaceX. GE Vernova traded at around 30x expected cash flow, and four times revenue last year.

Vertiv, a company that sells cooling and power equipment for data centres, was recently traded at 19 times the expected operating profit, and 6 times sales last year.

MESSY PRICES AND RATIONALIZATION

Investors and bankers say that SpaceX is difficult to price due to the unique nature of its space operations and AI businesses, which are difficult to value in an early stage.

Aswath?Damodaran, finance professor and valuation expert at New York University Stern School of Business, said: "Pricing will always be messy." "Nobody has the capacity to launch satellites at such a low price and in such large numbers as they do. That's their biggest advantage."

He says that the current price is a reflection of investors' justifications for purchasing the shares, rather than traditional metrics. They're hoping that there is enough momentum and mood behind SpaceX and, when it goes public in the future, this will drive the stock price up.

"They have already decided that SpaceX will be a good buy," Damodaran stated. "Now they are looking for a way to justify this, and the pricing is that exposed rationalization."

(source: Reuters)