Latest News

What one year's Trump's climate censorship has revealed

EPA reportedly removes a climate page that mentions "human-caused"

Data preservation and tracking changes are a priority for groups

The future of climate reporting is in the air

By David Sherfinski

The administration has removed all references to climate justice and environmental change from government resources. It even deleted or blocked access to data and information which could contradict or undermine his agenda.

The implications of this are huge - and they could be even more severe during his remaining term.

There is a perception among some that scientists who don't support the agenda will be muzzled, and that findings that are misrepresented or incorrectly found out, in order to promote the agenda, will be published. This was said by Jonathan Gilmour of the Public Environmental Data Partners.

Trump has called climate change a "con-job" and his administration is working to reopen coal plants that have been closed, increase oil and gas production and eliminate tax incentives for renewable resources such as wind and solar.

The White House has not responded to any requests for comments.

Gilmour stated that "it undermines the very premise of democracy" to try to hide what's happening inside and outside the government, and to silence scientists. He also said it was a mistake to stop data streams which tell us about our world and public health as well as the environment.

"I am afraid that we may be less safe and healthier and will not understand the risks affecting our lives and livelihoods."

"NATURAL" CLIMATE CHANGE

In December, the Environmental Protection Agency began removing references to "human-caused" climate change from their online resources.

Izzy Pacenza, a member of the Environmental Data & Governance Initiative (EDGI), a group that tracks changes on federal sites, reported the removal of about 80 pages. Many of these pages were related to climate change and its causes and effects.

She said that "on certain pages that are still accessible, what was removed is very specific information that discusses the anthropogenic cause of climate change."

She said that the EPA page on climate change causes still has the same information, but the part about human-caused changes being impossible to explain by natural events is gone. All the remaining information is about the natural factors for Earth's climate variations.

In a report released by the Energy Department in July, a few climate scientists who were against global warming downplayed its dangers.

A spokesperson for the EPA said that the agency no longer "takes marching orders" from the "climate cult."

The spokesperson stated that "At Trump EPA we adhere to gold-standard science and total transparency. We are also committed to fulfilling our statutory duties."

The public can access previous versions of the site that did not meet the standards.

The administration also stopped adding information to the database of natural catastrophes that caused damages totaling at least $1 billion.

It has also limited public access to the National Climate Assessment (NCA), a report mandated by Congress that is released every four years. The NCA documents the human impact on global warming.

Pacenza stated that "the biggest thing I learned is that there's no rhyme or reason for the changes we see on federal websites."

She said that "targeted removal of facts" will "lead a lack in trust".

Fight Back

Pacenza and Gilmour's groups are members of Public Environmental Data Partners. This group is working on preserving or moving some climate data that the administration has limited.

Gilmour stated that "this crisis has forced community to mobilise in a manner it likely would not have",

"And this means more exchange of ideas. This means that funders will be re-energized and pay more attention to the project. We can engage in these big questions, and we can engage with each other.

Last year, the Public Environmental Data Partners and the research group Climate Central released their own versions of the billion dollar disaster database.

Gilmour is concerned that the job cuts may also be causing major damage. As the administration cuts the federal workforce, many climate experts have lost their jobs. Their knowledge is not replaced.

He said: "What we see is that the human infrastructure is... being cut, reassigned and intimidated."

He added, "It has downstream effects we haven't yet understood." "There is so much work that won't get done, because offices are now empty."

'HATCHET'

Rachel Cleetus remembered receiving an email last year saying that her contributions to the National Climate Assessment were no longer required. The administration had stated last year they were in the process of reviewing the scope.

The initiative was formed in 1990 and due to publish its sixth report by?2027. The report was not completed after Trump cut funding, and the experts who wrote it were fired last year. The website that hosted past reports has been taken down.

"This kind of science is not prescriptive. It is the kind we really need." It's not political. Cleetus, of the Union of Concerned Scientists (a nonprofit advocacy organization), said that it is not partisan.

The assessment is a key policy tool that helps the government and private sector prepare for climate change.

It's... factual information you can use. To cut this off, it's a scandal."

(source: Reuters)