Latest News

Trump EPA aims at repealing vehicle emission regulations after revoking the greenhouse gas endangerment findings

According to the summary of the proposal, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to repeal the greenhouse gas emissions standards for light, medium, and heavy duty vehicles and engines within the next few days, after removing the scientific findings that justified these rules.

The agency will likely state in a draft summary of its upcoming proposal that the Clean Air Act doesn't authorize it to impose emissions standards to address concerns about global climate change and that they will rescind their finding that GHG emission from new motor vehicles or engines is harmful to public health and welfare.

The report is expected to cast doubt on the scientific evidence used to reach the conclusion.

The summary states that "We propose as an alternative to rescinding the Administrator's conclusions because the EPA analyzed the scientific records in a way that was unreasonable and because recent developments have cast serious doubts on the reliability" of the findings.

In its landmark Massachusetts v. EPA decision in 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court said that the EPA had authority under the Clean Air Act, to regulate greenhouse gases emissions. The court also required the agency make a scientific determination on whether these emissions endanger the public's health.

In 2009, under the former president Barack Obama, the EPA issued a conclusion that emissions from motor vehicles contributed to pollution and endangered public health and welfare. The EPA's findings were upheld by several legal challenges, and they influenced subsequent greenhouse gas regulations.

In the summary, it is also stated that the rationale for the repeal of the vehicle standards was that the technology required to reduce emissions could cause greater harm to the public's health and welfare.

The administration of former President Joe Biden said that the standards would increase upfront vehicle prices, but save consumers money over time after taking into account lower fuel costs.

According to a source who requested anonymity, the agency will announce its proposal in the next few days.

The EPA announced that it sent its proposal for reconsidering the endangerment findings to the White House on June 30, for review. The agency announced that the proposal would be made public for public comment and notice once it had been reviewed by all agencies and signed by the administrator.

The agency has not commented on the tailpipe regulations.

The rescinding all vehicle emissions standards is the latest – and most comprehensive – attempt to end EPA tailpipe regulations that were predicted to reduce greenhouse gas emission by 49% in 2032 compared to 2026 levels.

According to EPA statistics, 29% of U.S. emissions are from the transportation industry.

To meet the requirement, the EPA predicts that between 35 and 56 percent of all vehicles sold between 2030 and 2032 will be EVs.

The Trump administration has adopted a multi-pronged strategy to undo rules that were designed to increase vehicle efficiency, reduce fuel consumption and promote electric vehicles. This includes ending the $7.500 new EV credit and $4,000 for used EVs on September 30. It has also frozen billions in funding to states to support EV charging.

According to legislation signed by Donald Trump in early August, automakers will not be fined for failing to meet fuel-efficiency standards dating back to 2022.

In 2018, Chrysler's parent company Stellantis, which is owned by Chrysler, paid nearly $400 million in penalties between 2016 and 2019. GM paid $128.2 millions in penalties between 2016 and 2017.

In June, Trump approved three congressional resolutions that barred California's mandates for electric vehicle sales and diesel engine regulations. Trump has approved a resolution that will bar California's historic plan to stop the sale of gasoline only vehicles by 2035. This plan was adopted by 11 states, representing one third of the U.S. automobile market. California has filed a lawsuit to reverse the repeal. (Reporting and editing by David Gregorio, Valerie Volcovici, and David Shepardson)

(source: Reuters)