Latest News

Belgian farmer takes TotalEnergies to court, seeking environment damages

A Belgian farmer is taking French oil and gas business TotalEnergies to court, seeking compensation for damage to his farm connected to climate modification and a legal order for the business to stop financial investment in brand-new nonrenewable fuel source tasks.

The case, submitted on Wednesday at the Tournai commercial court, is the first environment change-related claim in Belgium to target an international business. It follows a case in which thousands of people successfully took legal action against the Belgian government to require stronger greenhouse-gas emission cuts.

Hugues Falys, who farms cattle in the municipality of Lessines, is seeking to require TotalEnergies to overhaul its organization plan - consisting of instantly stopping financial investment in brand-new fossil fuel jobs and lowering its oil and gas production each by 47% by 2030.

He also looks for damages, which, if awarded, he will donate to a sustainable farming organisation.

TotalEnergies stated in a statement the company had actually not gotten main notice of the summons, and therefore would not discuss the case.

TotalEnergies regrets the litigation procedure undertaken: the problem of environment change and the energy shift is not the legal duty of an offered star however rather the cumulative effort of the whole of society, the statement said, adding that the business's transition method was centred around emissions-free electrical power sources and gas.

The case is part of a swelling tide of climate litigation, with 2,180 climate-related court cases submitted as of completion of 2022, amid the getting worse effects of worldwide warming from dangerous heatwaves to diminishing water resources.

The Belgian case is unusual, nevertheless, for trying to hold a fossil fuel company accountable for environment damage in a. nation besides where the company is based. TotalEnergies is. headquartered in Paris, France.

' DEPENDING ON ENVIRONMENT'

Falys and the three NGOs bringing the case argue that, as. one of the world's leading 20 CO2-emitting business, TotalEnergies. is instrumental for damage to his operations from extreme. weather condition in the years 2016-2022.

Throughout that duration, an extreme storm and succeeding droughts. lowered his crop and meadow yields, forcing him to purchase animal. feed and eventually to decrease the size of his herd.

We are an activity completely based on the environment,. Falys informed .

He argues TotalEnergies stopped working to abide by Belgian law,. which specifies that anybody who triggers damage should make reparations. for it.

This case strengthens the message that significant polluters have. tasks and face liability wherever they do business, direct. their items, and trigger damage, said Nikki Reisch, a director. at the Centre for International Environmental Law.

In a similar significant climate case, Peruvian farmer Saul. Luciano Lliuya argues German utility RWE's emissions have. added to the melting of Andean glaciers. That case is. continuing through the courts.

Matthias Petel from the League of Human Rights, among the. campaign groups bringing the Belgian case, said the match intended. to develop legal avenues that could be duplicated versus other. large-emitting companies.

The legal requirements that we utilizing are quite. replicable, Petel said.

(source: Reuters)