Latest News
-
Tesla and Australia's Syrah extend deadline for resolving alleged default on graphite supply contract
Syrah Resources, an Australian graphite mining company, announced on Monday that it had agreed to extend to June 1 a deadline for resolving a alleged breach of a graphite supplying agreement with Tesla. Tesla issued a previous notice alleging Syrah had failed to comply with an obligation to supply natural graphite AAM samples from its Vidalia plant in?Louisiana. The notice stated that Syrah must cure the alleged default before March 16 or else Tesla may terminate the offtake agreement for supply from Syrah’s 11,25 kilotons per annum AAM facility located in Vidalia. The companies have agreed to extend the deadline of the agreement to June 1, subject to approval by the U.S. Department of Energy. The contract, which is worth 8,000 tonnes annually over four years, will support Syrah Vidalia and its strategy to become one of the largest?U.S. Suppliers of non-Chinese Graphite. Tesla, based in Texas, issued its first default notice on July 20, 2025. It said that Syrah had failed to deliver active anode samples from Vidalia's processing facility. Syrah announced on Monday that it "doesn't accept" that it was in default, but that the two parties had agreed to extend a cure date until?June 1, while they work together? to resolve?the problem. As of 2302 GMT, shares of Syrah rose 2.9% to A$0.175. (Reporting and editing by Sonali Paul in Bengaluru, Roshan Thomas from Bengaluru)
-
EU to discuss bolstering Mideast Naval Mission amid Iran War Terror
Diplomats and officials claim that the European Union's foreign ministers are expected to discuss Monday the augmentation of a small naval operation in the Middle East, but they will not?decide? on extending the mission to the blocked Strait of Hormuz. Aspides, the EU's mission in the Red Sea to protect ships against attacks by Yemeni Houthi rebels was created in 2024. The mission currently has two Italian and Greek ships under its command, and it can call on a French vessel and another Italian ship for assistance. Some European officials have wondered if the EU mission can help restore the freedom of navigation to the Gulf. The Strait of Hormuz has been largely closed since the United States, Israel and Iran began their attacks on Iran in February. Iran's ability to "choke off" traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, which is the conduit for about a fifth (or more) of the world's oil and natural gas liquefied, has become a major concern for the global economy. The EU officials and diplomats have said that the ministers' discussion on Monday will likely be centered?on an initiative by EU?foreign-policy chief Kaja Kallas, to add more vessels to the mission. The conversation on Monday is about getting more member states to contribute additional capacities, said a senior EU Official speaking under condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal discussions. GERMAN MINISTER SKeptical ABOUT EXPANSION INTO STRAIT of HORMUZ German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul stated on Sunday that Aspides, named after the Greek term for "shields", was not effective at completing its current task. In an interview with Germany’s ARD TV, he stated: "I am very sceptical about the idea that extending Aspides into the Strait of Hormuz will provide greater security." U.S. President Donald Trump called on China on Saturday to join the effort to reopen shipping routes. He also called on France, Japan and South Korea to do the same. Officials have stated that France is seeking to form a coalition in order to secure the Strait of Gibraltar 'once the security situation stabilises.' Meanwhile, Britain has discussed a variety of options with its allies to ensure the safety of shipping. Diplomats and officials said it was too early to determine whether the EU could play a part in such an initiative. All 27 EU member states would have to approve any change in the mandate of Aspides. A diplomat from the EU said, "Ministers will not take lightly the decision to protect ships in the Strait of Hormuz under the current circumstances." (Reporting and writing by Andrew Gray, Lili Bayer and Diane Craft; Editing by Andrew Gray)
-
UK's Starmer promises to protect "working people" from conflict fallout
Keir starmer, the British prime minister, will pledge on Monday to help "working people", whose cost of living is being exacerbated by the conflict in the Middle East. He will warn companies not to try to "exploit" this crisis by raising prices. Starmer's latest effort to calm British concerns about the Strait of Hormuz conflict, which has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz as a vital waterway that transports oil and liquefied gas, will be "to assist you in the cost of living through this crisis". Finance Minister Rachel Reeves announced on Saturday that the government would provide "targeted support" for?poorer families after being under pressure to cap household energy tariffs regulated by the government and to scrap an increase in vehicle fuel duties. A Financial Times report was confirmed by a?government official that the government would set up a 50 million pound ($66.11 millions) package to help the most vulnerable families, primarily those in rural areas who depend on heating oil. Moments like these are what show you the true nature of a government. My answer is simple. This government will always be there for the working class, no matter what challenges may lie ahead," Starmer said in excerpts of his speech released by Starmer's office. He will respond to reports that heating oil suppliers were canceling orders and raising prices: "I won't tolerate companies trying exploit this crisis in order to make money off working people." The companies will face legal action if they have violated the law. The government has warned energy companies before. On Friday, it called petrol retailers to have a "frank" and "open" discussion on pricing. However, the meeting almost didn't happen because the Petrol Retailers Association threatened to pull out due to the ministers "inflammatory language". Reeves, in an interview with The Times published on Saturday, said that the government is looking into options to help those?vulnerable to sharp increases in energy prices?, particularly those who rely on heating oil. However, he ruled out universal assistance for all households because it would not be affordable. Starmer and his team believe that the best way to stop the rise in energy prices is to de-escalate things. He will state that "we will continue to work towards a rapid resolution of the Middle East situation." There is no doubt that ending the conflict is the fastest way to lower the cost of living. ($1 = 0.7563 pound) (Reporting and editing by Andrew Heavens; Elizabeth Piper)
-
Australia's Lynas signss US rare-earth oxide supply deal
Australia's Lynas Rare Earths announced on Monday that?its unit Lynas US LLC had signed a binding letter of intent with the U.S. government to finalise an agreement for rare earth oxide supplies. According to the agreement, the Pentagon will spend $96 million on Lynas's light and heavy rare-earth oxide products, with an NdPr oxide floor price of $110 per kilogram. Lynas stated that the letter of intent outlines a framework for four-year supply agreement to support U.S. National Security and Supply-Chain Resilience objectives. It was revealed that the new offtake agreement 'followed a mutual decision by the companies to revise their earlier?agreement because of?uncertainty about the future of the heavy rare earth processing plant in Seadrift Texas. Amanda Lacaze, CEO of Lynas, said: "This agreement will ensure that the U.S. Defense Industrial Base has access to Light and Heavy Rare Earth Oxides which are vital to modern manufacturing." Rare earths are used in a small, but 'critical' amount to power devices ranging from iPhones, washing machines, to F-35 jets. The agreement comes at a time when the United States is trying to secure vital?minerals, and reduce its reliance on China. China produces about?90% the world's rare-earth magnets. Lynas, the largest rare earths producer in the world outside of China.
-
Japan releases oil stocks after US orders to buy American
Japan will'start releasing oil from their stockpiles? on Monday in order to ease the shock of the?U.S. - Israeli?war against Iran. This is a stark reminder to the oil crisis that occurred half a century earlier, which prompted Tokyo to build reserves. Tokyo announced that it would release 80 million barrels of crude oil to Japan, which is enough to last the nation for 45 days. The war in the Gulf has disrupted supplies through the Strait of Hormuz. The Japanese government has instructed the country's refineries to use the crude oil released, which will reduce national reserves by 17% to ensure domestic supplies. The amount of oil that will be released to the 400 million barrels coordinated by the International Energy Agency is unknown. RESERVES STABILISE SUPPLY, BUT "MAINLY BUILD TIME" Yuriy humber, CEO of Tokyo-based consultancy Yuri Group, stated that the release by Japan shows how seriously Tokyo views disruption. The reserves are a short-term stabiliser of supplies and prices, but they mainly serve to buy time. He said that they can't "fully offset" a disruption of the Strait of Hormuz. The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry states that any potential release of 12 million barrels held jointly by Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Kuwait in Japan would be additional to the 80 million barrels announced. Japan began its national oil reserves system in 1978 - several years after Arab oil embargo. Group of Seven nation that relies on the Middle East to provide around 90% of their oil now stocks 254 days of consumption. METI reports that the government will begin releasing oil from its reserves to cover 15 days of consumption in the private sector on Monday, and one month's supply by late this month. Ryosei Akazawa, METI Minister, said that private companies are preparing to tap into?Japan’s stockpiles. He also stated that they were looking for supplies coming from the U.S.A., Central Asia and South America, as well as Gulf countries, which can bypass the Strait of Hormuz. Japan gets around 4% its oil from the U.S., after stopping most purchases from Russia following Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 - when Tokyo last used its reserves. Lee Zeldin, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency administrator said: "When you consider the conflict in the Middle East... it's a reminder that all the?crude?oil that went from Alaska - to Japan - was never the target of a successful terrorist terrorism?attack." This conflict is a reminder to other nations that the United States has the resources. (Reporting and editing by William Mallard; Additional reporting in Washington by Valerie Volcovici; Reporting by Katya Obayashi and Yuka obayashi)
-
South32, Australia's South32, mothballs Mozal after failing to find affordable power
South32, an Australian diversified miner, announced on Monday that it had put its Mozal aluminum smelter in Mozambique under a 'care and maintenance' program on March 15. The company claimed that it was unable to secure a sufficient and affordable supply of power for Mozal after March 2026. As a result, it placed the smelter in care and maintenance. The Perth-based company and Mozambique’s government and energy suppliers have been negotiating for years in order to come up with an agreement that would allow the smelter to continue its energy-intensive operations. South32 has been in discussions with Hidroelectrica de Cahora Bassa, a hydroelectric power'supplier owned by the Mozambique Government for over six years about a tariff that is set to expire on March 20, 2026. Aluminium production is an energy-intensive process, so a reliable power supply for aluminium manufacturers such as South32 is a major concern. Mozal, in which South32 has a stake of 63.7%, is a major contributor to the aluminium output for South32, accounting for just under 29% of total aluminium production by fiscal 2025. South32 reported a $372-million impairment to the Mozal Smelter as part of its fiscal year 2025 results. This was due to the financial impact from the shutdown. In a statement, the company stated that the alumina sold to Mozal by the?Worsley Alumina Refinery?will be sold to third-party customers at index linked prices.
-
Sassou, Congo Republic's Sassou, seeks a new term amid low turnout and internet outage
The Congo Republic held a presidential election on Sunday, which was expected to extend the reign of Denis Sassou Nguesso - one of Africa's most experienced leaders. A low turnout highlighted the lack of suspense about the result. Sassou is facing a "weak" field of opponents, as two of the most well-known opposition leaders are in prison or exile. Many opposition parties boycotted this election because they felt the process was untrustworthy. Analysts and civil society groups predict that the turnout will be lower than the 68% in 2021 when Sassou was elected to his five-year term with 88.4%. A witness reported that there were no or very short lines at the polling stations of Brazzaville's capital. Sassou, after casting his vote in Brazzaville told reporters that he hoped the?enthusiasm he saw on the campaign trail?would be apparent in the final turnout number. He said: "We are hopeful that the things I heard during the campaign will come to pass today." The voting was to finish at 6 pm local time (1700 GMT) and the counting would begin immediately afterwards. The provisional results will be available 48-72 hours after polls close. INTERNET OUTAGE REPORTED Sassou has been in power since 1979, with the exception of a five-year break in the 1990s. He ran against six candidates who were not well-known, and none of them was considered a serious contender. The electoral body was dominated by figures aligned to the ruling Congolese Labour Party. Remadji Hoinathy, of the Institute for Security Studies in Pretoria, said that "the opposition is fragmented" and does not have a "strong, emblematic figure". Sassou will still have a chance despite voter fatigue. Internet monitoring group NetBlocks reported that the internet was down in many parts of the country on Election Day, making it hard to get an accurate picture of what was happening. In an email, Alp Toker of NetBlocks confirmed that a nationwide internet blackout was now in place in the Republic of Congo. This measure is likely to limit transparency in today's elections. Toker stated that this was "technically compatible" with a?internet shutdown imposed for the 2021 presidential election. Neither the Congolese Prime Minister Anatole Collinet Makosso nor the Communications Minister Thierry Moungalla responded to inquiries about the outage. Voters See No Hope for Change Rights groups claim that the political space in Congo has shrunk in recent years. They cite arrests of activists, and suspensions by political parties. After a long decline, the economy - heavily dependent on crude oil - has stabilised over the past few years. According to the World Bank, 52% of Congo’s 6.1m people live in poverty. Some Congolese who voted said that the country needs a new direction. They did not specify whether they backed Sassou, or his opponent. Gigi Wandiabantou, a Brazzaville resident, said: "Our children have diplomas and they are not doing anything." "I'm counting on the people in charge to do something for us mothers." Some Congolese believe there is little hope for change. Frederic Nkou, a Brazzaville resident who is unemployed, said: "It's a?election with a known outcome." "I don’t expect things will improve." Makosso, the Prime Minister, dismissed allegations of pro-Sassou slant ahead of Sunday's vote. He argued that Congo's electoral oversight bodies will ensure a fair and transparent election. Sassou's campaign has been based on continuity. He has pledged to expand education and training and to speed up development projects. Clement Bonnerot, Ngouda Diaone and Robbie Corey Boulet in the Dakar and Congo Republic Newsroom. Editing by Andrei Khalip Joe Bavier Alexander Smith
-
Netanyahu responds to Iran's rumours about his death by posting a video
Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister, posted a video on Sunday of him 'getting a coffee and' chatting with an aide after rumours of his death or injury were spread by the iranian state media. In the video taken in a café on the outskirts of Jerusalem and posted to Netanyahu's Telegram, his aide questions him about the rumours. As he grabs a coffee, Netanyahu makes a joke about the word "dead" -- which in Hebrew slang is used to refer to someone or something that you are "crazy for". "I love coffee. You know what? Netanyahu tells his aide, "I'm mad about my people." The video's location was verified by comparing the file images of the cafe with the interiors shown in the video. The cafe posted multiple photos and videos of Netanyahu's Sunday visit. This allowed us to verify the date. Netanyahu's office distributed videos and limited media access since the U.S. launched its attack on Iran in February. He has also visited two towns that were hit by Iranian missiles as well as a hospital, port, military base and a?port. Netanyahu, who rarely gives interviews or news conferences to Israeli media, held a 'first press conference via video link since the beginning of the war on Thursday. This format was similar to that he used in June, during Israel's 12-day conflict with Iran. Since the beginning of the war, Israel has imposed emergency safety restrictions that have banned public gatherings. Most people are now at home or in safe rooms and shelters. Schools across the majority of the country are closed.
The top cases in the US Supreme Court docket
During its current term, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a number of important cases involving such issues as presidential powers and tariffs, gun rights, birthright citizenship laws, transgender sports, campaign finance laws, voting rights, LGBT “conversion therapy”, religious rights and capital penalty. The term began in October, and will run through June. Separately, the court has also acted in emergency cases in several cases that challenge President Donald Trump's policy.
TRUMP'S TARIFS The Supreme Court ruled on February 20, a decision that has major implications for global economics, to?down' Trump's tariffs. Trump had imposed them under a law intended for national emergencies. The ruling, which was 6-3 in favor of the lower court decision, confirmed that Trump had exceeded his legal authority by using this 1977 law. The court ruled that Trump did not have the authority to impose tariffs based on the law in question, the International Emergency Economic 'Powers Act (IEEPA). Congress has the power to impose taxes and tariffs, not the President, according to the U.S. Constitution. Tariffs are at the heart of a global trade conflict that Trump started after he entered his second term in office. This war has alienated trading partner, affected financial markets, and created global economic uncertainty.
TRUMP'S FIRE OF FED OFFICIAL Justices showed skepticism towards Trump's attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, in a case which could threaten the independence of the central bank. The justices said they would not grant Trump's request for a judge to overturn a decision that prevented him from firing Cook immediately while her legal case played out. Congress created the Fed by passing a law called the Federal Reserve Act. The law included provisions meant to protect the central bank against political interference. Governors could only be removed from office by the president "for cause", though it does not define that term or establish procedures for removal. Trump claimed that Cook's firing was due to unproven allegations of mortgage fraud, which she has denied. Cook, who is still in her position for now, said that the allegations were a pretext used to fire Cook over differences of monetary policy, as Trump pressures the Fed to reduce interest rates. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
Birthright Citizenship The court will hear arguments about the legality of Trump’s directive on April 1, which restricts birthright citizenship. This is a controversial part of Trump’s efforts to curb immigration, and would change the way a 19th-century constitutional provision has been understood for many years. The lower court blocked Trump’s executive order, which instructed U.S. agencies to refuse to recognize citizenship for children born in the U.S. when neither parent was an American citizen or a legal permanent resident (also known as a "green-card" holder). The court found that Trump's directive violated both the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and federal law codifying the birthright citizenship rights.
LOUISIANA ELECTORAL DISTRICTS The conservative justices of the court signaled on October 15, their willingness to undermine another key section in the Voting Right Act, the 1965 landmark law enacted to prevent racial bias in voting. This was during arguments in a case involving Louisiana's electoral districts. The case centers on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits voting maps that dilute the power of minorities without proof of racism. The lower court found that the Louisiana electoral map, which divided the six U.S. House of Representatives districts into two districts with a majority of Black people instead of one district previously, violated the Constitution’s promise of equality protection. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
Federal Trade Commission Firing The conservative justices of the court have signaled that they will uphold Trump's legality in firing a Federal Trade Commission Member and give an historic boost to president power, while also putting at risk a 90-year old legal precedent. On December 8, the court heard arguments in the Justice Department appeal of the lower court's ruling that the Republican President exceeded his authority by dismissing Democratic FTC member Rebecca Slaughter before her term was due to end in March. The conservative justices seemed sympathetic to the Trump Administration's argument that tenure protections granted by Congress to heads of independent agencies illegally infringed on presidential powers under the U.S. Constitution. Trump was allowed to remove Slaughter until the case concluded. The court is expected to make a decision by the end June.
TRANSGENDER SPORTS PARTIcipation The conservative justices seemed ready to uphold the state laws that ban transgender athletes to female sports teams despite escalating national efforts to restrict transgender rights. On January 13, the court heard arguments from Idaho and West Virginia in appeals of lower court decisions siding with transgender student who challenged the 'bans' in both states as a violation of the U.S. Constitution, and a federal antidiscrimination act. 25 other states also have laws similar to this one. The conservative justices expressed concerns over imposing a uniform law on the whole country, amid a sharp disagreement and uncertainty about whether medications such as puberty-blocking hormones or gender affirming hormones remove male physiological advantages in sport. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
LGBT 'CONVERSION THERAPEUTY'
During arguments on October 7, the court's conservatives appeared to be ready to support a challenge to a Colorado statute that prohibits psychotherapists from performing "conversion therapy," which aims to change minors' sexual orientation or gender identities. The law was challenged by a Christian licensed counselor under the First Amendment's protections from government?abridgment free speech. Colorado said that it regulates professional conduct and not speech and has the legal power to prohibit a healthcare practice they deem unsafe and ineffective. A lower court upheld this law. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
HAWAII GUNS LAW The conservatives expressed skepticism about a Hawaii gun law which restricts handguns from being carried on public property, such as businesses. They appeared ready to expand the right to carry guns again. On January 20, the court heard arguments in an appeal by opponents of the law, backed by Trump's administration, regarding a judicial decision that Hawaii's Democratic backed measure is likely compliant with the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment right to bear arms. Hawaii's law demands that a property owner "expressly authorize" the bringing of a handgun on private property. Four other states in the United States have laws similar to Hawaii's. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
Drug Users and Guns The Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case on March 2, involving a dual American/Pakistani national in Texas, to defend the Trump Administration's bid for a federal gun law that prohibits users of illegal drugs. Hunter Biden, son of former president Joe Biden, was charged under this law in 2023. The Justice Department appealed a lower court ruling which found that the gun restrictions were in violation of the Second Amendment rights to "keep and carry arms" guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. The Gun Control Act, which was passed in 1968, prohibited gun ownership by drug users.
CAMPAIGN-FINANCE On December 9, the court heard arguments in a Republican led bid to overturn federal spending limits by political parties coordinated with candidates. The case involved Vice President JDVance. The conservative justices seemed to be sympathetic towards the challenge. However, the three liberal members of the court appeared inclined to maintain the spending limits. The debate centers around whether federal limits on campaign spending coordinated with candidates' input violate First Amendment protections against government abridgment. Vance and Republican challengers have appealed the ruling of a lower court that limited how much money political parties could spend on campaigns, with input from candidates who they support. This type of spending is called coordinated party expenses. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
MAIL-IN-BALLOTS On March 23, the court will hear arguments as Mississippi defends its state law that allows mail-in votes received after Election Day, to be counted. This case could lead to stricter voting laws in other states. A lower court declared illegal a state law allowing mail-in ballots received by certain voters that were stamped on or before Election Day, but not until five business days following a federal election.
U.S. ASYLUM - PROCESSING: The court will hear arguments from the Trump administration on March 24, as it defends its authority to limit asylum processing at the ports of entry along U.S. - Mexico border. The Trump administration appealed the lower court's ruling that the "metering policy" was illegal. This allowed U.S. Immigration officials to stop asylum seekers and refuse to process their claims at the border. Former President Joe Biden rescinded the policy, but Trump’s administration indicated that it may consider resuming.
Human Rights Abuses Abroad The court heard an appeal from Cisco Systems, in which the company and Trump administration asked the justices for a limit on the federal law used to hold corporations liable for abuses of human rights committed abroad. Cisco appealed the 2023 ruling which gave new life to a lawsuit filed in 2011 accusing the California-based firm of developing technology that enabled China's government monitor and persecute Falun Gong members. The Alien Tort Statute was the basis of the lawsuit. This 1789 law had lain dormant in U.S. courtrooms for almost two centuries, before attorneys began to use it in the 1980s in order to bring international human rights cases. Arguments in the case have not been scheduled.
CRISIS PRINCIPAL CENTERS In a dispute arising from an investigation by the New Jersey Attorney General into whether or not these facilities engaged in deceptive practice, the court appears to be inclined to side with the Christian faith-based "crisis pregnancies centers" that are anti-abortion. During the December 2 arguments, a large majority of the Justices appeared to be inclined to revive a lawsuit filed by First Choice Women's Resource Centers against Democratic Attorney General Matthew Platkin's subpoena 2023 seeking information about the organization's doctors and donors. First Choice's facilities are designed to discourage women from getting abortions. The decision is expected to be made by the end June.
RASTAFARIAN INMATES The conservative justices seemed inclined to reject the Rastafarian inmate's attempt to sue Louisiana state prison officials after they shaved his head in violation of?religious belief. The case was brought before the court in November 10 under a federal statute protecting incarcerated persons from religious discrimination. Plaintiff Damon Landor's religion requires that he let his hair grow. He appealed the decision of a lower court to dismiss his lawsuit, because they found that the statute in question did not allow for him to sue officials individually for monetary damages. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
INMATE ON DEATH ROW The court heard arguments on December 10, in an attempt by Alabama officials, to pursue the execution a convict convicted of a murder in 1997 after a lower judge found him intellectually disabled. The Republican-led state has appealed a lower court ruling that Joseph Clifton Smith was intellectually handicapped based on his intelligence quotient (IQ), test scores, and expert testimony. In a 2002 Supreme Court decision, the court ruled that executing a person intellectually challenged violated the Eighth Amendment of U.S. Constitution prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment. The Supreme Court is expected to rule by the end June.
WEEDKILLER CANCER CLAIM
The court will consider Bayer's request to limit lawsuits claiming the German biotechnology and pharmaceutical company's Roundup weedkiller 'causes cancer' and possibly avoid billions of dollar in damages. Bayer appealed the ruling of a lower court in a case filed by a man claiming he was diagnosed as having non-Hodgkin lymphoma following years of exposure Roundup. The lower court rejected Bayer’s argument that U.S. pesticide law bars lawsuits based on claims made under state laws. Arguments in the case have not been scheduled.
FCC FINES FOR WIRELESS CARRIER The Justices will hear the dispute over fines levied by the Federal Communications Commission against major U.S. carriers who shared customer location data with other companies without their consent. This is the latest case that has reached the Supreme Court challenging the authority of an American regulatory agency. The case concerns the FCC's efforts to impose tens-of-millions-of-dollars in fines on carriers like Verizon Communications and AT&T before they had their day in the court. Arguments in the case have not been scheduled.
COX COPYRIGHT DISSERT The court heard arguments in December in an attempt by Cox Communications, a provider of internet services, to avoid financial responsibility in a major copyright lawsuit brought by record labels who accused Cox of allowing its customers to piracy thousands of songs. Justices appeared to be skeptical about Cox's claim that mere knowledge of user piracy was not enough for it to be held liable for copyright violations. A lower court ordered that a new trial be held to determine the amount of money Cox owes Sony Music Group, Warner Music Group Universal Music Group and others for contributing copyright infringement. Cox, which is the largest division of privately-owned Cox Enterprises said that the retrial may result in a verdict of up to $1.5 billion against it. The ruling is expected to be made by the end June.
(source: Reuters)