Latest News

German court rules that Apple Watch is not a "CO2-neutral" product

German court rules that Apple Watch is not a "CO2-neutral" product

Apple cannot advertise the Apple Watch in Germany as a CO2-neutral product, after a ruling by a German court on Tuesday. The court upheld an environmentalist complaint, and found that Apple had misled its consumers.

A Frankfurt regional court said that Apple advertised the device as "our first CO2-neutral" product online. The claim was found to be unfounded by a panel and to violate German competition law.

Apple's spokesperson declined to comment on the decision, saying that it "largely upholds our rigorous approach to Carbon Neutrality".

Apple said in June that the German lawsuit threatened to "discourage the kind of credible climate action around the world needed."

A spokesperson still referred to a Tuesday report that Apple would phase out the "carbon neutral" label it uses on Apple Watches to comply with EU legislation which will come into effect in September 2026 and restrict the use of these terms.

Apple's claim of carbon neutrality is based on a project that it runs in Paraguay, where it offsets emissions by planting Eucalyptus trees.

Eucalyptus trees are grown in plantations throughout the world.

Criticised

Ecologists claim that monocultures are harmful to biodiversity and water-intensive, earning them the name 'green deserts'.

Frankfurt's court ruled that 75% of the area was not leased beyond 2029, and the company couldn't guarantee that these contracts would be renewed.

The statement stated that "the continuation of the Forest Project is not a secure future."

Meta and Microsoft, along with Apple, have invested in similar projects throughout Latin America to earn carbon credits.

The environmentalist group Deutsche Umwelthilfe, which brought the case and sued Apple, hailed this ruling as a victory against "greenwashing."

In a press release, DUH's Juergen Resch said that "the supposed storage of CO2 by commercial eucalyptus plants is limited to only a few short years. The contractual guarantees are insufficient for the future and the ecological integrity in monoculture areas cannot be guaranteed." (Reporting and editing by FriederikeHeine and Louise Heavens).

(source: Reuters)