Latest News

Oil prices to rise as US strikes against Iran increase supply risk premium

Market analysts say that oil is expected to increase by $3-5 per barrel when trading resumes Sunday evening, after the U.S. launched an attack on Iran over the weekend. Gains are only expected to accelerate if Iran responds harshly and disrupts the supply of oil.

Donald Trump, the U.S. president, said that he "obliterated", Iran's nuclear sites with overnight strikes. He joined an Israeli assault on an escalation in conflict in the Middle East. Tehran pledged to defend itself. Iran is OPEC’s third largest crude producer.

Jorge Leon, former OPEC official and head of Rystad's geopolitical research, said that a spike in oil prices is to be expected. Even in the absence immediate retaliation by the US, markets will likely price in a higher risk premium.

SEB analyst Ole Hvalbye wrote in a report that Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil prices, could rise $3 to $5 a barrel at market opening. Brent crude settled at $77.01 per barrel on Friday, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate was at $73.84.

Ole Hansen is an analyst at Saxo Bank. He said that crude oil could open up to $4-$5 dollars higher with the possibility of some long positions being unwound.

Crude had settled down on Friday after the U.S. imposed fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on two entities based in Hong Kong, and counter-terrorism-related sanctions, according to a notice on the U.S. Treasury Department website.

Brent has increased by 11%, while WTI is up around 10%. The conflict started on June 13, when Israel began to target Iran's nuclear facilities and Iranian missiles hit Tel Aviv.

Oil's gains have been limited by the current stable supply conditions, and the availability spare production capacity from other OPEC member countries. Giovanni Staunovo is an analyst at UBS. He said that risk premiums typically decline when there are no supply disruptions.

He said that the direction of oil price will depend on whether or not there are disruptions in supply, which would result in higher prices. Or if there's a deescalation of the conflict resulting in a declining risk premium.

On June 19, a senior Iranian legislator said that Iran could close the Strait of Hormuz to retaliate against its enemies. However, a second member of the parliament stated that this would only be done if Tehran's vital interest were threatened.

The Strait is responsible for about a fifth (or 5%) of all oil consumed in the world.

SEB stated that any spillover or closure of the Strait would "significantly" lift oil prices. However, they saw this scenario more as a tail-risk than a base-case given China's dependence on Gulf crude.

Ajay Parmar said that it was unlikely Iran could block the Strait of Hormuz for a long time.

He said that "most of Iran's exports of oil to China pass through the strait, and Trump will not tolerate the inevitable oil price spike in the future for long." The diplomatic pressure from both the largest economies around the world would be equally significant. Reporting by Anna Hirtenstein in London, Ahmad Ghaddar in London, Robert Harvey in London and Seher Dareen and Arunima in Bengaluru. Editing by Alex Lawler and Clelia Oziel. Giles Elgood.

(source: Reuters)