Latest News

Swiss press state 'ridiculous' European environment ruling might harm democracy

Prominent newspapers in Switzerland on Wednesday criticised a climate modification judgment against the Swiss federal government by Europe's leading human rights court, stating it risked weakening democracy and the political influence of ecological groups.

Tuesday's judgment by the European Court of Person Rights in favour of over 2,000 Swiss ladies who stated Switzerland had not done enough to fight climate change is anticipated to push more individuals to bring climate cases against governments.

As ecological groups celebrated the judgment by the Strasbourg court, paper editorials said the decision would fan fears that the judiciary was getting involved in politics.

Absurd verdict against Switzerland: Strasbourg pursues climate policy from the judges bench, the center-right Neue Zuercher Zeitung (NZZ) paper composed.

Explaining the ruling as activist jurisprudence that could pave the way for all type of claims, the paper said the elderly plaintiffs were ultimately pawns of ecological lobbies that utilized the court to circumvent democratic debate.

Switzerland, where referendums frequently check the limits of nationwide policymaking, has actually dedicated to cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 50% by 2030, from 1990 levels.

The federal government had proposed stronger steps to provide the goal, but voters rebuffed them in a 2021 referendum.

Under the heading We do not want climate justice, national daily Blick called the court's ruling doubtful and warned it was most likely to deepen divisions over environment policy.

And in European politics, it should be noted, this plays into the hands of those who smell foreign judges everywhere, the paper composed.

The center-left everyday Tages-Anzeiger on the other hand said in an editorial that while the court had highlighted the limitations of Switzerland's climate agenda, democracy would come under pressure if courts started to shape policy.

Making reference to the 2021 referendum, the paper stated the ruling run the risk of confirming extensively held views that the court was horning in national decision-making.

That in turn could return to haunt environmentalists at When irritated voters vent their frustration, the tally box versus the Green parties who now wish to use the verdict for their political agenda, the paper wrote.

(source: Reuters)