Latest News

California authorizes neighborhood solar program backed by energies

The California Public Utilities Commission on Thursday approved a new solar energy program that the industry had actually said would not go far enough to incentivize smaller sized community jobs.

The choice marked the latest disappointment for the solar market in California, which is the top U.S. solar market in general but ranks 8th out of 50 states in neighborhood solar.

In the last two years, California has decreased incentives for the tidy energy technology, in part due to the fact that regulators fretted the subsidies were being moneyed by ratepayers who do not have solar.

The CPUC voted to broaden two existing programs and produce a. 3rd, which was supported by utilities, in a 3 to 1 vote. The. new program will have the ability to tap $250 million in federal funds. supplied under President Joe Biden's environment modification law, the. Inflation Decrease Act.

The program update, which was required by state law, remained in. part meant to broaden solar energy to lower-income Californians. who may live in homes or can not afford rooftop systems.

Regardless of its track record as a leader in solar energy,. California has lagged other states in structure neighborhood solar. projects. Since completion of 2023, California had 163 megawatts of. community solar, compared with more than 2 gigawatts in New York. and 1.1 GW in Massachusetts.

It's frustrating that the CPUC's decision stops working to. supply significant improvements to California's lackluster. neighborhood solar program, Steven King, a clean energy advocate. with green group Environment California, said in a declaration. Using spaces such as roofs, car park, and roadside. land for creating solar energy is important to deal with the. climate crisis and reach 100% clean energy as soon as possible.

California has amongst the most ambitious environment change. goals of any U.S. state, and Guv Gavin Newsom has vowed. to decarbonize the state's economy by 2045.

The CPUC decision marked a rejection of a scheme backed by. solar project developers, ratepayer supporters, environmental. groups and others that would have compensated task. subscribers for energy exported to the grid based upon the worth. of the electricity at that time.

The PUC stated that proposition would have increased expenses for. ratepayers not participating in the program.

Rather, the regulator welcomed a proposal to treat. community solar jobs like wholesale facilities and. compensate them at a rate they would spend for power somewhere else,. referred to as the avoided expense. That plan was backed by utilities. consisting of Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & & Electric.

The PUC stated it would sweeten the returns for task. developers with state and federal funds.

(source: Reuters)