Latest News

Climate court cases that could set precedents around the world

Courts worldwide are hearing an evergrowing variety of climatechange claims with some of the largest cases in history being decided in 2024 and 2025.

Here are the crucial cases to see:

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ)

The world's greatest court is expected to release a decision next year that will lay out U.N. member states' commitments in attending to climate modification.

The U.N. General Assembly asked the court last year to come up with an advisory viewpoint, following a four-year campaign by Vanuatu, a small Pacific island nation where a group of law students initially dreamed up the ICJ petition.

With scant precedent on climate modification in international law, the ICJ viewpoint might make use of arguments from past regional and nationwide court judgments.

Even a relatively conservative ruling asserting that a person nation's emissions can harm another nation might constitute a. major victory for poor countries asking abundant nations to pay more. for environment action.

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF PERSON RIGHTS (IACHR)

The climate case before the Inter-American Court is shaping up. to be the biggest environment case to date, making use of 262 submitted. legal briefs, more than 600 participants, and hearings in both. Barbados and Brazil.

Thought about one of the world's more progressive courts, the. IACHR might go further than its peers to set new legal guidelines and. standards connecting to national responsibilities around climate. change.

For example, the judges' advisory opinion could resolve. unique securities for environmental defenders facing violence,. name nonrenewable fuel sources particularly as a key culprit in environment. modification, or oblige states to manage contaminating business.

The court's opinion is anticipated by the end of the year, and. will right away apply to its 20 member countries in Latin. America and the Caribbean. INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA (ITLOS)

On Tuesday, the worldwide ocean court ruled that greenhouse. gas emissions absorbed by the ocean are a type of marine. contamination, subject to international controls.

An agent for the small-island countries that brought. the case hailed the choice as offering teeth to international environment. modification law.

The court stated that states are lawfully obligated to take all. measures necessary to restrict the increase in the typical worldwide. temperature increase to within 1.5 degrees Celsius of pre-industrial. levels, the target set in the 2015 Paris Arrangement.

Countries are obliged to secure marine environments, even. if they need to go beyond the Paris requirements to do so, the. court said.

EUROPEAN COURT OF PERSON RIGHTS (ECtHR)

The European Court ruled in April that Switzerland had violated. the rights of a group of 2,000 senior women by not doing enough. to combat climate modification.

Unlike the other multilateral courts that are releasing. advisory viewpoints, the European lawsuit was a contentious. lawsuit with a legally binding ruling that orders Switzerland to. revise its climate policies.

The case develops legal precedent for 46 nations that. are signatories of the European Convention on Human Being Rights.

The European Court has seven similar cases on the docket. including 2 that would directly affect Norway's oil industry.

SOUTH KOREA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

Asia's very first climate-related suit in a nationwide court joins. together five various petitions into one mega case arguing. that South Korea stopped working to secure more than 200 individuals from. environment change.

The petitioners include young activists, children, infants. and one person who was a foetus at the time of legal filing.

AUSTRALIA: TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER CLASS ACTION. An Australian federal court is hearing the first class-action. lawsuit brought by Australian First Nations people, arguing the. state has stopped working to protect them from climate change.

The plaintiffs reside on the remote islands of Boigu and. Saibai in the Torres Strait between Australia and Papua New. Guinea. They argue that the nation's inaction on environment change. methods rising sea levels will ruin their homes and ultimately. result in the disappearance of their islands under the waves.

(source: Reuters)