Latest News

Ecological activists win landmark ruling over UK oil well plan

Preparation authorities must have thought about the effect of climatewarming emissions in authorizing an oil well near Gatwick Airport, the UK's highest court stated on Thursday, a ruling activists say could exceptionally impact new nonrenewable fuel source projects in Britain.

Environmental advocates had actually argued that planning authorization to maintain and broaden the oil well site near London's. Gatwick was flawed since it had ruled out the effect of. greenhouse gas emissions from the use of the oil.

Supreme Court judges agreed by a narrow three to 2. bulk, and quashed the planning approval which they stated was. illegal.

While the court stated councils could still approve schemes. even if they were likely to trigger significant damage to the. environment, advocates stated the landmark judgment would make. it much harder for brand-new oil, gas and coal developments to get. approval.

This historical judgment is a watershed moment in the fight to. stop even more nonrenewable fuel source extraction jobs in the UK and make. the emissions cuts required to satisfy important environment targets,. Good friends of the Earth lawyer Katie de Kauwe said.

It is a huge increase to everybody involved in resisting fossil. fuel tasks.

The campaign groups said the judgment might hit proposals for. other controversial plans such a new coal mine in Cumbria,. northern England, as well as North Sea oil and gas tasks.

Oil and gas business will be working through the judgment. to assess to what level it impacts future jobs in the UK,. and existing challenges before the courts, which had actually been remained. pending the Supreme Court's decision, Tom Cummins, partner at. law practice Ashurst.

The government stated it would carefully consider the effect. of the ruling and any importance for other ongoing legal. procedures.

NEW OIL WELLS

The case concerned a decision in 2019 by Surrey County. Council to allow Horse Hill Developments, part-owned by British. energy business UK Oil & & Gas Plc (UKOG), to retain 2 oil wells. and drill four more over a 20-year duration near the town of. Horley, close to Gatwick.

An Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIA) for the job. taken a look at the effect of the construction, production and. decommissioning of the website, but did not assess the effect from. emissions that would result from using the improved oil.

The Weald Action Group (WAG), an umbrella organisation for. local groups that project against the extraction of oil and gas. in southeast England, estimated this would correspond to more than. 10 million tonnes of carbon emissions.

A campaigner acting for WAG introduced a legal difficulty. against the planning approval on the basis the EIA was flawed,. but this was turned down both by the High Court in London and after that. by the Court of Appeal.

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court overthrew, stating it was. inevitable there would be combustion emissions from the improved. oil.

It is not challenged that these emissions, which can easily. be quantified, will have a considerable influence on environment, stated. George Leggatt, among the three Supreme Court justices who. agreed with the appeal.

The only problem is whether the combustion emissions are. results of the task at all. It appears to me plain that they. are.

UKOG's CEO Stephen Sanderson stated the business's focus had. shifted from oil and gas to underground hydrogen storage, however. added it would work closely with the local authority to account. for this retrospective change to EIA requirements.

The council itself said planning approval for the oil well. remains to be identified in due course.

(source: Reuters)