Latest News

Trump's 'targeted' attack on climate data escalates across government

Trump administration limits climate data and references

The effort is seen as being more "targeted" than the first term

Volunteers restore and preserve historical information

By David Sherfinski

Data experts are scrambling in the campaign to restore and conserve what they can, while trying to keep up with an all-out effort they claim extends beyond what President Obama was attempting to achieve during his first term.

Jonathan Gilmour of the Public Environmental Data Partners coalition, which works on data restoration, said: "It's far more focused, organized and rapid."

The Environmental Protection Agency, as part of the administration's efforts to improve public health, is working to revert the long-held conclusion that greenhouse gasses are harmful. The administration also deletes, removes and minimizes reams and reams data and web pages related to environmental justice.

"The dominant attitude of the first administration to climate change was a kind of denial." Now, we're seeing climate erasure," Gilmour said.

It is much more dangerous than the standard denial. They are trying to remove data that we use in order to understand how humans have affected the world, and how these changes affect us, our societies and health.

LIMITATION OF ONLINE AVAILABILITY

The Trump administration is limiting and removing climate change data and studies through the EPA and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

This includes limiting public access to the National Climate Assessment (NCA), a report mandated by Congress that is released every four years. It documents the human impact on global warming.

After the administration fired hundreds of researchers and expert workers working on the new version, a White House official stated that the scope of the report was "reevaluated."

Officials said that participants in the assessment were informed they would be "released from their role... whilst plans are being developed for the next assessment, noting there may be future chances for them to engage or contribute."

NASA had indicated that it would attempt to host older reports online following the shutdown of the U.S. The Global Change Research Program, which oversees climate assessments, went dark at the end of June.

This appears to be no longer the case.

NASA spokesperson said that the USGCRP had "met its statutory obligations by presenting their reports to Congress."

Bethany Stevens, spokesperson for NASA, said that the agency was not legally bound to host data from globalchange.gov.

The Biden administration also removed the environmental justice screening tool it had set up online as part of their pledge to direct at least 40% certain federal benefits towards historically underserved areas.

Izzy Pacenza is the project coordinator for the Environmental Data & Governance Initiative, which also works with Public Environmental Data Partners.

"But personally, I did not expect it to be so extensive and that it would be one of first things that the Administration targeted."

The EPA has not responded to any requests for comments.

"SHOOTING YOURSELF in the FOOT"

NOAA announced in May that it will no longer be adding disasters to its database if the damage exceeds one billion dollars, but it will keep all historical data up until 2024.

NOAA did not also respond to requests for comments.

Fulton Ring is a private firm that works in partnership with the Partnership. This month, Fulton Ring announced it had restored its version of the billion dollar disaster database.

Rajan Desai is a co-founder of the company. He said, "I believe the attack on data may have been unprecedented. It's a case where you prove a point by shooting yourself in your foot."

Why would you ruin your government's capability to send a signal, right? It makes no sense."

Desai explained that part of the problem is now spreading the message, which is essentially a grassroots, volunteer effort.

"It is a good thing to archive these data sets but, it's like a tree falling in the forest, and no one was around to hear it. Did it really happen?" Desai stated.

If you don't do anything useful with these datasets, you won't have the support to start recollecting these data.

Pacenza stated that the message was to not allow private individuals to fill government functions.

Pacenza stated that "they have the resources and the money to do this and it is also funded by our taxpayer dollars."

(source: Reuters)