Latest News

Abundant countries, island states lock horns on climate modification at UN court

The World Court concludes hearings on Friday on countries' legal responsibility to eliminate climate modification and whether large states contributing most to greenhousegas emissions may be liable for damage triggered to small island countries. The International Court of Justice will release an opinion on those questions, likely in 2025, that might be pointed out in environment changedriven litigation around the world. During two weeks of hearings, rich nations of the worldwide north broadly argued that existing climate treaties like the Paris Agreement, which are largely nonbinding, ought to be the basis for choosing countries' obligations. For their part, developing countries and little island states bearing the impact of environment change sought robust measures to curb emissions, and want to control financial support from wealthy contaminating countries. On the existing trajectory of greenhouse gas emissions, Tuvalu will disappear totally underneath the waves, Eselealofa Apinelu, representing the little island state, informed the judges. Almost 100 states and organisations took part in hearings at the organization, the top U.N. court for disputes between states, where little island nations had spearheaded the efforts to get the U.N. General Assembly to request an advisory opinion.

World Court opinions are not binding, however bring legal and political weight. Specialists state the court's viewpoint on climate modification could set a precedent in climate change-driven claims in courts from Europe to Latin America and beyond.

The power of an ICJ viewpoint does not lie only in its direct enforcement, however in the clear message and assistance it will send to the many courts worldwide that are grappling with the concern of state responsibilities to address the environment emergency situation and solution climate damage, Nikki Reisch, director of the Center for International Environmental Law's Environment & & Energy Program, told Reuters. The hearings opened in early December with Pacific island country Vanuatu, which advised judges to identify and fix the damage triggered by climate modification. The world's biggest emitters, the U.S. and China, together with countries like Saudi Arabia and several EU members, argued that existing treaties produced by U.N.-backed environment change settlements, which are largely non-binding, need to be the standard in determining states' commitments. China hopes that the court will uphold the U.N. environment modification settlements mechanism as the main channel for worldwide climate governance, Ma Xinmin, a legal adviser in China's foreign ministry, told the court.

Under the Paris Agreement, nations need to update their national climate plans, referred to as Nationally Figured out

(source: Reuters)