Latest News
-
SDF chief: PKK disarmament calls 'not relevant to us in Syria
The commander of Kurdish-led force that controls northeastern Syria has said that the call for dissolution of the PKK by the leader in Turkey of the militant Kurdistan Workers Party, (PKK), does not apply to his group. Mazloum Abdi, commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), welcomed Abdullah Ocalan's historic call for the PKK not to continue its decades-long struggle against the Turkish State. He said that this would have positive effects in the region. Abdi, however, said that the announcement made by Ocalan on Thursday by the PKK was only applicable to them and "had nothing to do with us in Syria". Abdi's statement indicated that Ocalan's declaration would not have an immediate impact on SDF despite Syria's most important Kurdish groups, the People's Protection Units(YPG), which are the core of SDF. The Turkish government says that the YPG and PKK are virtually identical. They have fought the group along with other Syrian armed groups aligned to Turkey. Abdi stated that if there is peace in Turkey then there is no reason to continue attacking us in Syria. Abdi’s group took control of Kurdish areas in northern Syria in 2011, after the Syrian Civil War began. It later became an important U.S. ally in the fight against Islamic State and expanded the area it controlled. The SDF had little interaction with the Syrian army when Bashar al Assad was president. The SDF is now facing calls from the new Damascus administration The newly formed state security forces will combine the forces that ousted Assad last December. Turkey is a major supporter of the new Syrian government. Abdi expressed his willingness to have his forces join the new ministry of defence, but he said that they should be joined as a group rather than individually, an idea which was rejected by the government. The SDF and the Kurdish led administration were not invited to the national dialogue conference held in Damascus, on February 25. The Kurdish led administration claimed that the conference was not representative of Syrians. Abdi stated that the Syrian Kurdish authority would organise their own local dialog on the future for the northeastern area. (Reporting and editing by Mark Heinrich; Timour Azhari)
-
Sources say sanctions and tariffs are making OPEC+ hesitant about an April oil price hike.
Eight OPEC+ sources have said that OPEC+ members are debating whether or not to increase oil production in April, as planned, or to freeze it, as they struggle to understand the global supply situation due to new U.S. sanctions against Venezuela, Iran, and Russia. OPEC+ confirms its policy of supply a month in advance, so that buyers have enough time to order crude. The group has until the end of March to decide on its April production, but some sources claim that no consensus has yet been reached. Several sources have said that the United Arab Emirates would also like to see the increase in production, as they are eager to take advantage of their rising capacity. Russia would be happy to do the same. They said that other members, including Saudi Arabia, favoured a delay. U.S. president Donald Trump renewed pressure on OPEC in order to lower oil prices. Prices rose above $82 a barrel in January, reaching multi-month highs following the announcement of new sanctions against Russia by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden. Prices have since fallen to $73 in hopes that Trump will help seal a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine, and increase Russian oil flow. His plans to reduce Iran's oil to zero, and the cancellation of Chevron's licence to operate in Venezuela this week have stopped prices from further falling. Eight OPEC+ sources stated that the combination of these bullish and negative factors has made April's decision-making extremely complex. The eight OPEC+ sources also said that Trump's plans to impose global tariffs on oil could decrease demand and further complicate the outlook. Due to the sensitive nature of the subject, all sources declined to provide their names. OPEC, and the Saudi government's communications office, did not immediately respond to comments. The offices of Russian Deputy Premier Alexander Novak and UAE Energy Ministry did not respond immediately to requests for comments. OPEC+ (which includes OPEC plus Russia and allies) has agreed to cut production by 5,85 million barrels a day (bpd), which is equal to 5.7% of the global supply. This was done in a series steps taken since 2022, to support market. OPEC+ has extended the latest round of cuts to the first quarter 2025. This means that the production increase plan will now begin in April. This was just the latest in a series of delays. Calculations show that based on this plan, the UAE will begin to increase its production in April, with a 138,000 bpd monthly increase. Morgan Stanley and other analysts have predicted that OPEC+ will extend the cuts. Helima Croft, RBC Capital Markets, said that sanctions and tariffs could delay the increase until the second half 2025. Reporting by Alex Lawler and Olesya Almakhova; editing by Dmitry Zhdannikov, David Evans, Yousef Raba, Ahmad Ghaddar
-
White House clarifies Trump's statement about 65% EPA Staff Cuts
The White House announced on Thursday that it was retracting President Donald Trump's claim made the day before, claiming the Environmental Protection Agency planned to reduce its workforce by 65%. Instead, the agency plans to reduce its expenditures by 65%. Trump surprised EPA workers on Wednesday by announcing at his first Cabinet meeting that EPA administrator Lee Zeldin had told him that the agency would "cut 65 or so per cent of people from environmental". Taylor Rogers, White House spokesperson, clarified Trump's Thursday statement by saying that further workforce reductions will continue along with spending cuts. Nearly 400 probationary staff have been terminated and nearly 200 others who work on environmental justice issues in the agency are on leave. Rogers stated in a press release that "President Trump and DOGE are committed to cutting fraud and waste across all agencies." "After identifying $20 billion of fraudulent spending, Administrator Zeldin is committed to eliminating 65% wasteful expenditures at the EPA." Trump clarified on Thursday in a Truth Social post that his proposed tariffs of 25% on Mexican and Canadian products will take effect on March 4. This follows some confusion Wednesday, when Trump said the tariffs would go into effect on April 2. Zeldin announced on social media that he had "discovered" that the Biden Administration fraudulently distributed $20 billion to green groups. He is now trying to recover these funds from a bank holding them. Democratic lawmakers have reacted to what they consider Zeldin's illegal actions, claiming that funding was appropriated by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act to organizations in the U.S. for the purpose of awarding grants to local communities to develop clean energy projects. Elon Musk, the tech billionaire, has announced plans to reduce the number of civilian employees by 2.3 million. The Department of Government Efficiency, which is headed by Musk, will target career employees who represent the majority of this workforce. (Reporting and editing by Louise Heavens, Daniel Wallis, and Doina Chiacu)
-
Trump announces tariffs on March 4, 2019 for Mexico and Canada; China will face an additional 10%
U.S. president Donald Trump announced on Thursday that the 25% tariffs he proposed on Mexican and Canadian products will be implemented on March 4, as planned, because drugs continue to pour into the U.S. Trump said that he would also impose an extra 10% duty on Chinese products on the same day. It would seem that this is in addition to the 10% tariff he imposed on Chinese imports on February 4. Trump said that drugs are still entering the U.S. in "very high levels and unacceptable levels," a majority of which is the deadly opioid fentanyl. "We can't allow this scourge continue to harm the USA and, therefore, until the TARIFFS proposed to take effect on MARCH 4TH go into effect as scheduled," Trump stated in a posting on his Truth Social site. "China will also be charged an extra 10% tariff on that date." The statement clarified some confusion about the deadlines for the harsh tariffs that Trump threatened on Canadian and Mexican products over the fentanyl epidemic and U.S. Border Security. Trump's remarks on the subject during his first Cabinet meeting on Wednesday appeared to indicate that he might push back the deadline by about a month, until April 4. Trump administration officials stated that the deadline for April was to match Trump's "reciprocal duties" with import duty rates from other countries, and offset their other restrictions. His trade advisors believe that the value added tax (VAT) of European countries is similar to a tariff. Kevin Hassett told CNBC that Trump will decide on new tariffs once a study has been completed by April 1st. He said that a study would be released on April 1 and that afterward, the president would decide what to do with tariff policies for countries around the world. Mexico and Canada were specifically mentioned. Talks on Border Talks, Tariffs On Thursday and Friday, Canadian and Mexican officials will meet their counterparts from the Trump administration in Washington to try and prevent tariffs that could be a major blow to an integrated North American economy. On Thursday, the newly-confirmed U.S. Trade Rep Jamieson Greer and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will meet with Mexican Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard. David McGuinty, Canada's Minister of Public Safety, said that on Thursday the Trump administration should be satisfied with Canada's progress in tightening border security and fighting drug smuggling. McGuinty told reporters via televised remarks in Washington, ahead of two days' talks with U.S. officials: "The evidence is undeniable - progress is being achieved." He said that he believed Canada had passed any test imposed on it in regards to showing progress and meeting border standards. Canada Border Services Agency announced in a press release that they were launching an initiative to intercept illegal contraband entering and leaving Canada, with a particular focus on synthetic narcotics and fentanyl. In a letter sent to U.S. trade representative Jamieson Greer by China, the country said that China and the United States must engage in equal dialogue and consultation in order to address their concerns on economic and commercial issues. (Reporting and writing by Doina Chiacu, Joseph Ax and David Lawder; editing by Chizu Nomiyama & Alistair Bell).
-
TSX to lose as trade tensions cloud bank results
The main Canadian stock index was unable to find direction Thursday, as global trade tensions escalated and fueled a risk-averse market. Strong bank earnings failed to lift the market sentiment. After three consecutive sessions in which the index had gained, it was down 0.08% to 25,309.9. Michael Sprung, President of Sprung Investment Management, said that the markets will be in a very uncertain state for some time. "The main confusion comes from the tariffs. This is especially true for Canada and Mexico. But now, the threat of tariffs against the European Union has also caused concern." U.S. president Donald Trump proposed an extension of a month on the new tariffs that could take effect April 2 for imports from Mexico and Canada. He also proposed a "reciprocal tariff" of 25% on European cars and other goods. The TSX fell 1.3% due to a decline in gold prices of more than 1%, to the lowest level for over a week. This was due to a stronger dollar. Three major Canadian banks had strong results in the quarter, but the heavily-weighted sector of finance fell by 0.5%. After beating quarterly profit expectations on Thursday, shares of Royal Bank of Canada fell 3.2%, TD Bank lost 0.5%, and CIBC gained 0.8 %. The technology sector fell 0.5% and gave up its gains from the previous session. Energy stocks grew more than 1%, capping losses overall, as oil prices rose 1.5%, after Trump canceled Chevron’s Venezuela operations licence, causing supply concerns. Superior Plus, a utilities provider that exceeded revenue forecasts for the quarter, topped benchmark index by 10%. Veren shares rose by 9% after better-than expected quarterly results. (Reporting by Ragini Mathur in Bengaluru; Editing by Shreya Biswas)
-
USDA: US corn and soybean plantings to increase in 2025
The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced on Thursday that farmers in the United States will plant more corn acres and less soybeans by 2025 compared to a year ago. The USDA predicted corn seedings to increase from 90,6 million acres in 2024 to 94,000 acres and soybean seedings to 84,000 acres, a decrease from 87.1 millions acres last year. The USDA expects to plant 47.0 million acres of wheat, an increase from 46.1 in 2024. The USDA released a report at the beginning of its two-day annual outlook forum that stated, "Among the main crops, corn is projected to grow the most. Prices are favorable compared to other crops like soybeans, cotton and sorghum." The global corn supply was tightened during the 2024/25 year of marketing, which helped to raise the price for feed grain. The United States is the largest corn exporter in the world and the second biggest soybean supplier behind Brazil. The USDA's estimate for soybean plantings fell short of the analyst average of 84.4 millions acres. The government has said that the large supply of soybeans from South America and Brazil is putting pressure on the prices. This should limit the amount of oilseed planted in the United States. The USDA predicted that, assuming normal weather conditions, the U.S. corn crop in 2025 would reach a record of 15,585 billion bushels. And the soybean harvest, at 4,370 billion bushels, would be the 4th largest ever. The USDA predicted that the U.S. would have 1.965 million bushels of corn at the end 2025/26 of the marketing year, on August 31st 2026. This is up from 1.540 million bushels one year ago. The projected decline in soybean stocks to 320,000,000 bushels by the end 2025/26 was from 380,000,000 bushels at 2024/25. USDA forecasts soybean exports in 2025/26 at 1.865 billion bushels. This is an increase of 40 million bushels over 2024/25. The USDA warned that U.S. soybean exports will remain below 30% compared to 40% 10 years ago due to competition from South American suppliers. The U.S. Wheat inventories are expected to increase to 826 millions bushels at the end of 2025/26, up from 794million a year ago, despite a projected drop in production. The USDA forecasts that wheat exports will be 850 million bushels in 2025/26, the same as for the current marketing season, but higher than a 52-year-low set in 2023/24 when high U.S. price curbed global demand for U.S. Wheat. In 2025/26, the competition from other global wheat producers, including Russia is expected to continue. Seth Meyer, USDA Chief Economist, said that "we will continue to face some export challenges" in a Thursday speech.
-
Rebels claim 11 killed in blasts at rally in east Congo
The leader of the rebel coalition said that explosions caused the deaths of 11 people and the injuries of 65 others at a rally organized by M23 rebels on Thursday in the eastern Congo City of Bukavu. He blamed the violence on President Felix Tshisekedi. The Congolese presidency, which claims that Rwanda, a neighbouring country, is supporting the insurgents in a post, claimed on X that "several deaths" had occurred in a posting on X, and blamed a "foreign army illegally on Congolese territory". Both sides claimed to have evidence, but neither side did so. Corneille Nangaa said that the grenades were of the same type used by Burundi’s army in Congo at a recent press conference. This information is not independent. The spokesperson for the Burundian Army Brigadier-General Gaspard Baratuza said there were no Burundian troops in Bukavu, but did not respond to the accusations over the grenades. Since the beginning of this year, the rebels have advanced through the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, capturing Bukavu as well as the largest city in the region Goma. Video footage shows people running in the streets with some bleeding, and others carrying limp bodies. According to a medical source, 65 patients were also being treated at Bukavu General Hospital for injuries. Nangaa claimed that he had not been injured and that other senior rebel members were also safe. Rwanda has denied the accusations made by Congo, U.N., and Western powers that it is supporting Nangaa M23 rebels. The rapid advance of the rebels has sparked fears that a regional conflict could involve Congo's neighbors. Rwanda says it is protecting itself from the Hutu militia that it claims is fighting alongside the Congolese army. Reporting by Congo Newsroom and Sonia Rolley, Paris; Writing and editing by Robbie Corey Boulet and Portia Crowe; Alexandra Hudson and Andrew Heavens
-
Apple sued for claiming watches are carbon neutral
Apple was sued by consumers who claimed that its claims that the three Apple Watches versions are "carbon neutral" or environmentally friendly were false and misleading. Seven purchasers of Apple Watch Series 9 SE and Ultra 2 with green tags filed a lawsuit on Wednesday at the San Jose federal court in California. They said that if they had known the truth, they would either not have purchased their watches, or they would have paid less. Apple, known for its iPhone, announced the launch of the watches in 2023. They claimed that they would be carbon-neutral through a combination lower emissions and the purchase of carbon offsets. The plaintiffs, from California, Florida, and Washington, D.C., said that two carbon offset projects, on which Apple relied in order to meet its corporate emission target, did not result in "genuine reductions" of carbon. The project's land was already heavily covered with trees before it began. The complaint stated that "in both cases, carbon reductions would not have happened without Apple's involvement in the projects or their existence," Apple's claims of carbon neutrality are misleading and false because they are based on the effectiveness and legitimacy these projects. According to the plaintiffs, 70% of U.S. consumers and Canadians consider environmental sustainability a crucial factor when purchasing products. This is according to a National Retail Federation study and IBM. Apple didn't immediately respond to comments on Thursday. Cupertino-based Apple has set a goal to become carbon neutral in 2030, and this includes its supply chain. The lawsuit filed on Wednesday seeks unspecified compensation and an injunction to prevent Apple from marketing three watches as carbon-neutral. Dib et al v Apple Inc., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California No. 25-02043. Reporting by Jonathan Stempel, New York; Editing and proofreading by Hugh Lawson
Climate investment is challenged by EU green finance rowback
The European Commission's decision to reduce its sustainability reporting standards could make it more difficult for investors to choose where to invest their money in order to help the EU reach its climate targets.
Since the 2015 global agreement on climate change, Europe has been leading the way in figuring how to move real economies towards net-zero emission by 2050. This includes defining what "green" investments look like and having companies disclose their ecological footprint.
This regulatory background has led to an increase in the number of new financial products that are aligned to the climate goals of the EU, including a near-term goal to reduce net emissions by 55% by 2030.
The European Commission announced plans on Wednesday to reduce the reporting burden for firms in response to the growing pressures from businesses and EU governments to assist struggling industries and the United States' rejection of climate action under Donald Trump.
The EU executive also proposed reducing the number of companies that must report data and softer penalties for those who violate it.
Some supporters of the move said that it would allow companies to concentrate on cutting emissions instead of filling in paperwork. Others said it would be difficult to compare actions between firms.
Hyewon KONG, Sustainable Investment Director of Gresham House, said that the proposal could undermine sustainability goals by introducing large exemptions and deferrals.
Brussels has scrapped its plans to create sector-specific reporting requirements. It also reduced the number of companies required to report data on emissions under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting directive by over 80%, and delayed the deadline for other companies.
Ashley Hamilton Claxton is the head of responsible investments at Royal London Asset Management. She welcomed the decision to simplify a "complex regulatory landscape", but called it a setback that sector-specific standards were being lost.
She said that "this information is crucial for... assessing whether companies are aligned with the Paris Agreement's goals."
EU officials claimed that the move would not undermine the EU's climate goals, but instead make it easier for investors and companies to achieve them.
Nathan Fabian said that the proposals will "materially" reduce the access of investors to information. The Principles for Responsible Investment is a U.N. investor network.
Marjella Lecourt Alma, CEO of Datamaran said that while the majority of major companies will still be subject to the new rules, investors may "struggling" to make connections on the risks that affect valuations.
The proposed rules limit the amount of additional sustainability information that banks or other investors can ask smaller companies to provide.
Filip Gregor said that this could lead to those who request extra information on sustainability from companies "being prosecuted" for their efforts.
The "taxonomy of green activities" that the bloc has developed to help investors understand how a company is improving its environmental performance will also be modified to exempt 80% of companies from reporting.
Matthew Fisher, the head of Watershed's policy department, explained that by delaying the deadline for reporting from many companies until the EU's 2030 target date to reduce emissions, Brussels could hinder its ability to achieve the goal.
He said: "If you delay or pause disclosure and transparency, this undermines these ambitious goals." "I don’t think these two things are fundamentally consistent". (Reporting and editing by Hugh Lawson; Simon Jessop).
(source: Reuters)