Latest News

US Trade Court rules Trump tariffs illegal but issues narrow block

The U.S. trade court ruled on Thursday against President Donald Trump’s latest 10% tariffs on global goods, stating that they were not justified by a 1970s law on trade. However, the court only halted 'the levy on Washington State and two small businesses.

The U.S. Court of International Trade has ruled in favor of two businesses, Washington State and the state of Washington that had challenged the tariffs which went into effect on 24 February. The decision was 2-1 with one judge stating that it was premature for the small businesses to win.

The White House didn't immediately respond to our request for comment.

The Trade Court declined to issue an order that would block tariffs on all imports. They rejected a request from a group of states led by Democrats.

The court determined that Washington was the only state that had imported goods and paid Section 122 tariffs. Washington provided evidence that it had paid tariffs via the University of Washington - a public research institute.

The?duties for other importers will continue to be in effect during any government appeal.

Basic Fun!, a toy manufacturer, and Burlap & Barrel, a spice importer both argued that the new tariffs were an attempt to sidestep a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision which struck down the Republican president's 2025 tariffs imposed under International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The two small businesses, toy company Basic Fun!

In his February order Trump invoked Section 122 of 1974's Trade Act, which allows duties to be imposed for up to 150 days in order for serious "balance of payment deficits" to be corrected or prevent a depreciation of dollars.

The court ruled on Thursday that the law did not apply to the types of trade deficits Trump cited in February's order.

This decision is a major win for American companies who rely on global manufacturing to provide safe and affordable products. Unlawful tariffs are making it difficult for companies like Basic Fun to grow and compete.

We are encouraged that the court recognized that these tariffs were beyond the President's authority. This ruling provides clarity and stability to companies that are navigating global supply chain," he said.

Trump's administration claimed that there was a "serious balance-of payments deficit" in the U.S., a deficit of $1.2 trillion annually on goods trade and a deficit of current account of 4% GDP. Some economists and lawyers argued that the U.S. was not at the brink of a balance-of payments crisis. This made the new duties susceptible to legal challenges.

(source: Reuters)