Latest News

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to pause cases as it reassesses policy

President Donald Trump's. administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday to put on. hold prepared arguments in a bid by fuel manufacturers to challenge. California's standards for automobile emissions and electric automobiles. under a federal air contamination law. The brand-new Republican administration likewise made comparable requests in. three other cases involving the actions of federal companies,. giving an early sign that it will take a fresh appearance at a. number of legal concerns before the court and possibly change. positions from Trump's Democratic predecessor Joe Biden.

The expected changes in the government's position may be a. better ideological suitable for the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative. bulk, that includes three justices appointed by Trump.

The conflict over California automobile requirements centers on an. exception given to that state in 2022 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency throughout Biden's presidency to. nationwide vehicle emission standards set by the firm under the. landmark Clean Air Act anti-pollution law.

Though states and towns are normally preempted. from enacting their own limits, Congress let the EPA waive the. preemption rule to allow California to set particular guidelines. that are stricter than federal requirements.

In asking the Supreme Court to stop briefly the case, Performing. Lawyer General Sarah Harris said in a filing, After the. modification in administration, EPA's acting administrator has. determined that the firm should reassess the basis for and. strength of the 2022 reinstatement choice.

The EPA's action renewed a waiver for California to set. its own tailpipe emissions limitations and zero-emission vehicle. mandate through 2025, reversing a 2019 choice during Trump's. initially term in office rescinding the waiver.

Valero's Diamond Option Energy and related. groups challenged the reinstatement of California's waiver,. arguing that the choice exceeded the EPA's power under the. Clean Air Act and inflicted harm on their bottom line by. reducing need for liquid fuels.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Circuit threw out the lawsuits, finding that Valero and the. states did not have the essential legal standing to bring their. claims.

Harris told the Supreme Court that the EPA's reassessment of. the matter might prevent the requirement for this court to identify. whether the challengers have legal standing.

The Supreme Court has taken a hesitant view towards. extensive authority for federal regulatory agencies, and has. restricted the powers of the EPA in some essential rulings in. recent years. In June, the court blocked the EPA's Good Next-door neighbor rule intended. at minimizing ozone emissions that might get worse air contamination in. surrounding states. In 2023, the court hobbled the EPA's power. to protect wetlands and fight water pollution. In 2022, it. enforced limits on the agency's authority under the Clean Air Act. to minimize coal- and gas-fired power plant carbon emissions. On Monday, his very first day back in workplace, Trump stated in an. executive order that he was seeking the repeal of a new waiver. given to California in December by the EPA enabling the state. to end the sale of gasoline-only lorries by 2035. That guideline has. been adopted by 11 other states.

Trump said the EPA should terminate where proper,. state emissions waivers that operate to restrict sales of. gasoline-powered autos.

Legal professionals anticipate Trump's administration to change. position in a number of major cases at the court, consisting of a. closely saw dispute including Tennessee's ban on. gender-affirming treatment for transgender minors and one. involving a federal guideline targeting mainly untraceable. guns called ghost weapons.

(source: Reuters)