Latest News

Under Trump, United States government legal stance poised to shift at Supreme Court

Republican Donald Trump's. return to the presidency is anticipated to precipitate a shift in. the U.S. federal government's legal position in significant cases pending at the. Supreme Court, including a carefully enjoyed disagreement involving. Tennessee's ban on genderaffirming healthcare for transgender. minors. After Trump succeeds Democrat Joe Biden on Jan. 20, other big. cases in which the new administration might change positions. include ones including the mostly untraceable guns called. ghost weapons, hazardous waste storage, flavored vape items and. securities scams, according to legal professionals. Trump on Wednesday tapped Republican congressman Matt Gaetz as. his candidate for attorney general of the United States. Trump has not yet announced. his nominee for U.S. solicitor general, the Justice Department. authorities who represents the government in Supreme Court cases.

I expect that the Trump lawyer general will alter. positions in significant cases before the Supreme Court, said Erwin. Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley Law. School.

It happened in 2016 and it occurred in 2020, Chemerinsky. included, referring to transfers of power with a president of one. party succeeding a president of the other.

The expected changes in positions by the new inbound. administration may be a closer ideological suitable for the Supreme. Court's 6-3 conservative majority, which includes three justices. selected by Trump.

I do not believe that Trump administration switches will. trouble this court excessive. My guess is that most or all of the. administration's switches will align with positions of a. majority on the court, and that they'll enjoy to have actually a. lawyer general who puts those positions before them,. University of Illinois Chicago law teacher Steve Schwinn stated.

The Supreme Court on Dec. 4 is scheduled to hear arguments. in the Biden administration's appeal of a lower court's choice. supporting Tennessee's Republican-backed state law prohibiting. medical treatments including adolescence blockers and hormonal agents for. minors experiencing gender dysphoria. That is the scientific. medical diagnosis for considerable distress resulting from an. incongruence between an individual's gender identity and sex assigned. at birth.

The Biden administration, which took legal action against in an attempt to obstruct. the law, has actually argued that the ban discriminates against these. adolescents based on their sex and transgender status, breaching. the U.S. Constitution's 14th Change equal security. guarantee.

One would not see a Trump administration seeking to advance. arguments that would protect the interests of trans individuals. and trans children, Georgetown University law teacher Michele. Goodwin stated. That appears extremely irregular with the line of. discourse that's come from Trump throughout his time of running as a. prospect and also inconsistent with his prior service in. office.

Trump's solicitor general also might reverse course on the. Biden administration's positions in 2 cases protecting. regulatory agencies - appeals including the Nuclear Regulatory. Commission's authority to certify nuclear waste storage. facilities and the U.S. Fda's rejections. of numerous applications to sell flavored vape products.

A U-turn likewise could come in the Biden administration's. support for shareholders in cases including separate private. securities scams suits versus chipmaker Nvidia and. Meta's Facebook social media platform.

I believe the Trump administration will be like other. Republican administrations, because they're going to be less. regulative than a common Democratic administration, and that. could indicate changing positions in cases in which they are on the. opposite from some regulated market, Cornell Law School. teacher Michael Dorf said.

' NATURE OF DEMOCRACY'

Such policy reversals at the Supreme Court are not uncommon. when a Republican president succeeds a Democrat, and vice versa.

The nature of democracy is that differences in political. opinions can be expressed in this way, said Deborah Widiss, an. Indiana University law professor who has actually blogged about this. dynamic.

As far as how the justices react, I do not think that the. simple reality of a switch need to necessarily reject the. federal government's position. These are contested legal concerns where. there are arguments on both sides, Widiss included. After Trump took workplace for the very first time in 2017, his. administration departed from legal positions advanced at the. Supreme Court under his Democratic predecessor Barack Obama on. problems from labor unions to internal judges at the Securities. and Exchange Commission to election law, Widiss noted. Trump's very first administration also rescinded a federal instruction. telling public schools to let transgender students use bathrooms. matching their gender identity, triggering the Supreme Court to. scrap plans to hear a case including a transgender public school. trainee in Virginia.

After Biden beat Trump in the 2020 election, his. administration reversed course on a few of his predecessor's. actions, particularly worrying immigration. This prompted the. Supreme Court in 2021 to ditch scheduled arguments in Trump's. appeals protecting his restrictive asylum policy and his strategy to. shift military funds to spend for the U.S.-Mexico border wall.

At the Biden administration's urging, the Supreme Court. dismissed in 2021 lawsuits over another migration procedure. devised under Trump that barred people considered most likely to need. government gain from legal long-term U.S. residency. Biden's. administration released a new rule in 2022.

TRANSGENDER ARGUMENTS

It remains to be seen how the Supreme Court would react to a. Trump decision to reverse course in the Tennessee case. A group of transgender teenagers and their moms and dads sued to. challenge the law before the Justice Department did so. While. the Supreme Court decided to hear only the administration's. appeal, it permitted the legal representative for these initial complainants to. participate in the arguments.

Because of this, even if the inbound Trump administration. revealed a modification in position, it appears unlikely that the case. would be dismissed as moot, stated David Gans, a lawyer at the. Constitutional Accountability Center liberal legal group.

The justices on Oct. 8 heard the Biden administration's. appeal protecting its 2022 policy targeting parts and kits. for ghost guns in a challenge by producers, gun owners and. weapon rights groups. Throughout arguments, a majority of the justices. appeared going to maintain the policy.

If the Trump administration wants to rescind the. policy, or they wish to drop the appeal, they might choose. that, Dorf said, presuming the Supreme Court doesn't by far. a decision before the modification in administration.

(source: Reuters)