Latest News

Climate advisory panels are dismantled by the US Treasury Department

The U.S. Financial Regulators voted Wednesday to dissolve two committees that were charged with monitoring the financial risks caused by climate change. This ends a multi-year effort of the Biden Administration to embed climate threats in financial regulations.

The Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), a multi-regulator body that monitors risk and is chaired Scott Bessent of the Treasury Department, revoked, by voice vote, without dissent, or abstentions, during a public meeting, the charters for its Climate-Related Financial Risk Committee, as well as its Climate-Related Financial Risk Advisory Committee.

Janet Yellen was Bessent’s predecessor in the Biden administration. She warned that severe weather, wildfires, and other climate events could have a large impact on U.S. economics and finances and cause asset losses.

Bessent explained that the dismantling of financial regulations was part his "back-to-basics" approach, which aims to reduce burdensome rules for banks and other lending institutions and to ease capital requirements.

Bessent said that by rescinding the charters the council could better focus their attention and resources on the core issues of financial stability and our efforts to encourage economic growth and security, while maintaining safety and soundness.

This is an important step in destroying Biden's energy and climate policies. It includes reducing federal funding for clean energy, as well as slashing the regulations that boost fossil fuel production.

Tracey Lewis is a senior policy adviser at Public Citizen, a non-profit organization. The committee's research on the financial impact of climate disasters in housing, homeowners' policies, and financial regulations plays an important role in protecting safety and soundness for the American financial system.

In a Treasury presentation, FSOC also announced its intention to review previous guidance on the designation of non-bank financial institutions as systemically significant financial institutions. This would expose them to greater supervision. (Reporting and editing by Sam Holmes; David Lawder)

(source: Reuters)