Latest News

Research shows that countries are still far behind in meeting UN biodiversity targets

Research published on Wednesday shows that governments are likely to fall far short of achieving a UN?target of protecting and conserving biodiversity in at least 30% of the land and oceans of the planet by 2030.

Nearly 200 countries have signed up to the "30-by-30" goal as part of the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which was agreed on in late 2022. They pledged to mobilize at least $100 billion per year to reverse decades worth of biodiversity loss.

According to research conducted by several environmental groups, including the US-based Campaign for Nature, despite the fact that another 1.3m sq km of land, and 6m sq km marine areas, have been formally protected since the agreement came into force, the total coverage still stands at only?20%, and 10%, respectively.

The findings are consistent with the official progress report that will be presented to the UN Convention for Biological Diversity conference in Yerevan (Armenia) next month.

The draft document released in July warns that the agreement's 23 goals will not be achieved by 2030 unless the collective implementation is accelerated.

Astrid Schomaker said, "Progress has been made, but unevenly, and not at the speed and scale needed to achieve the Framework’s 23 targets by 2020," at a UNCBD briefing this month.

According to the Campaign for Nature report, 26% of terrestrial areas and inland waters would be protected by 2030 if existing government pledges were met. However, only 13% marine ecosystems will be protected.

It said that the 'annual funding shortfall' is between $75 and $150 billion. Marine protection spending, however, only amounts to $1.8 billion, which is well below what was deemed necessary of $16 billion.

It said that even if "30x30" was achieved, there were still more efforts needed to protect ecosystems. Of the 10% of ocean currently covered by protection plans only 3.5% is considered "effectively protected".

"There is a huge gap between protection on paper and in reality." "A line on a chart does not mean that the water is protected," said Pauli Merman, senior director of oceans for WWF International.

(source: Reuters)