Latest News

Climate damage: The next blow to Europe's finances

The public purse will be liable for the damages caused by Europe's volatile weather. Since the majority of these economic losses are not insured, they will fall on the government unless urgent action is taken.

The wildfires that raged in the southwest of Europe this year, and the severe floods that struck Spain in 2024 as well as?Germany in 2021 and its neighbors show that climate damage is adding to a long list of financial strains that include?higher?defence expenditures and increasing costs associated with aging populations.

Federico Barriga Salazar, Fitch's head of Western Europe sovereign rating, explained that catastrophes are becoming more frequent. Previously, they were viewed as expensive budget one-offs, rather than a regular expenditure.

He said that if a government was already fiscally conservative, then it would have to make some trade-offs in terms of other expenditures. Although the current fiscal impact is small, it is widely accepted that the situation will worsen in the future. This is because the region is on the fastest-warming continent of the world.

According to the European Environment Agency, extreme weather and climate events caused an estimated EUR822 billion ($953billion) in economic losses in the European Union from 1980-2024. A quarter of this damage was inflicted just in the last four year.

The average public deficit in the eurozone is currently around 3%. Barriga-Salazar quoted estimates that the Spanish floods of 2024 -- Europe's most severe flooding event in 50 years -- would require reconstruction costs of 0.7% of GDP from 2024-2026. The EU estimates that only one quarter of climate-related catastrophe losses in the EU are insured, and in some countries, coverage is as low as 5%. Many fear that insurance coverage as a percentage of total costs will continue to decrease as extreme weather events become more frequent.

David Zahn, Franklin Templeton's head of European Fixed Income, said: "I think that this simply means that the more risks you have, the less they will be insured." "This is an important issue and will affect some countries by 1%-2% of their GDP."

The economic?think tank Bruegel calculated the majority of damage in 2021 would be covered by insurance in Belgium but that in Germany, due to the low insurance coverage, it would have been necessary to use public funds worth EUR30 billion.

ADVANCED AND SHARE RISKS

The European Union is due to publish proposals on climate resilience and risk-management this autumn. Attention has been focused on potential solutions. Greece, which is heavily dependent on tourism and is therefore at risk from heatwaves and fires, is exploring ways to increase insurance coverage and improve the infrastructure of tourist hotspots.

Portugal announced plans for mandatory home insurance, backed by an earthquake and natural disaster disaster fund as well as a solidarity mechanism that will guarantee universal access. This follows the huge floods of early 2026. Some may turn to 'catastrophe bond' investments, which offer handsome returns, but can also result in the loss of part or all their principal, if an event such as a tornado or earthquake occurs.

Zahn, a Franklin Templeton analyst, noted that this gamble could be expensive for the sovereign: "If it happens, the payoff is immediate." You could have five years without anything, but you would only pay 8% per annum. Heather Grabbe, Senior Fellow at Bruegel said that governments should put in place more systematic arrangements than emergency?spending which could create a perverse 'incentive' for households and business to not take out insurance.

Grabbe stated that all governments in Europe must assess their risk and develop comprehensive plans for reducing future damages through investments, as well pooling risks across the borders.

Many studies show that early investments to make economies more resilient to climate change will save money over time. This can help avoid what an Oxford University 2025 study called the "adaptation trap", in which repeated climate disasters increase debt, leaving less money available for protection measures.

The Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez argued that investments in green technologies worth 0.1% GDP could help prevent economic losses of eight times this amount and tax revenue losses three times as large.

The ECB proposed a?EU joint public-private reinsurance system pooling private risk from natural disasters. This scheme is backed by a?EU fund for public catastrophe financing.

The question is whether the 'heatwaves' of this summer will inspire the political will for governments and the EU to shoulder some of the initial costs of such an action.

According to a spokesperson for the European Commission, the EU executive is looking at ways to close the gap in climate insurance protection as part of a set of measures that will be adopted before the end of this year.

(source: Reuters)