Latest News

Marco Rubio warns diplomats not to mention the 'kill switch" in American technology

According to a recent cable, U.S. State Secretary Marco Rubio asked diplomats to fight against the idea of a "kill button" on American technology products. This follows the White House's decision to keep foreigners away from America's advanced AI models.

The talking points that were distributed worldwide show how U.S. Diplomats are dealing with the international backlash caused by Trump's attempts to control who and how American AI companies release models.

The State Department refused to comment, and the White House didn't respond to a comment request. Anthropic was forced to suspend global access to its most advanced models Mythos and Fable after the Trump administration blocked non-U.S. citizens from using them on June 12, citing national security concerns. Asian tech executives used the "disruption" to promote their own alternatives, while European legislators redoubled calls for digital independence. The fallout from the ban lingers even though it was lifted the following month. The U.S. government's desire to police AI products, and possibly yank them from allies' hands at any moment, was heightened by the June 2 executive orders of?Trump, who asked AI companies to submit their models for 30 days to cybersecurity testing before their release. The episode, according to European legislator Christophe Grudler, showed that the U.S. has a "kill-switch" over vital technologies that it is more than willing to use. Aura Salla of the European People's Party (the largest political group in the European Parliament) said that Europe "cannot continue building its tech stack on access that could be turned off overnight by a foreign government."

The State Department cable dated July 16 did not refer to Anthropic or specifically to Trump's executive orders or last month's banning of the company, but provided American diplomats talking points designed for countering arguments that have arisen in their wake.

The cable stated that "Kill Switch" is not the requirement of a 30-day test window or the suspension of certain uses prior to releasing a new, highly-potent technology. There is no'magic' button on the government's part. This narrative is exaggerated, and it doesn't capture all the nuanced aspects of U.S. Technology Policy."

AMERICAN AI SALE PITCH Rubio’s cable urged diplomats to oppose "so-called "digital sovereignty" initiatives. It defined these as?efforts that restrict American tech companies' access to foreign market, subject them localization requirements, or force them follow local rules such as content moderating. Rubio already told American diplomats earlier this year to oppose similar measures against data sovereignty.

The cable discussed also how to counter "AI sovereign" arguments. It instructed American diplomats that American AI products were the best available tools and to describe efforts to build rival AI systems from scratch as a waste time and resources.

The cable stated that "American AI firms can build large, autonomous AI infrastructure with secure and robust supplies chains that minimize backdoor risks." They build it. It's yours." Edward Fishman, the director of the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomics, at the Council on Foreign Relations said that he understood the safety concerns which led the U.S. Government to impose first restrictions on Anthropic’s models. These can be used to turbocharge complex hacking activities. Fishman, however, said that Trump's administration's tendency to use coercive economic instruments such as tariffs or sanctions against friends and enemies alike made the State Department pitch difficult to sell.

He said that European partners were worried that if they became "ultra-reliant" on U.S. frontier AI models, such as those produced by Anthropic or OpenAI, the U.S. might use this against them in the future. Salla, a European legislator, said that Trump's administration had repeatedly threatened countries such as Denmark, creating an atmosphere of distrust that could not be dispelled by rhetoric.

She said, "They haven't shown us any evidence that they are reliable business partners." (Reporting and editing by Deepa Babyington, Raphael Satter)

(source: Reuters)