Latest News

Marco Rubio warns diplomats not to mention the 'kill switch" in American technology

According to a cable reviewed by the.

The talking points were distributed worldwide and show how U.S. diplomacy is trying to deal the international backlash caused by the Trump administration's attempts to control who American AI companies can release their models to. The White House directed questions to the State Department which then pointed to an article from U.S. Jacob Helberg, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs at the State Department, condemned "autarkist" measures that aimed to push American AI technology aside and in favor of native AI. He called this trend "backwards and counterproductive." Rubio's letter follows the Trump Administration's move in June '12 to ban foreign nationals from Anthropic’s most advanced models Mythos and fable on national security grounds. This prompted the AI company, to suspend global access to these models. Asian tech executives used the disruption to promote their own alternatives, while European legislators redoubled calls for digital independence. The fallout from the ban lingers even though it was lifted the following month. The U.S. government's new desire to monitor AI products, and possibly yank them from allies' hands at any moment, was reflected in Trump's?executive orders of June 2, which required AI companies to submit their models for 30 days to cybersecurity testing before their release. The episode, according to European legislator Christophe Grudler, showed that the U.S. has a "kill-switch" over vital technologies that it is more than willing to use. Aura Salla of the European People's Party (the largest political group in the European Parliament) said that Europe "cannot continue building its tech stack based on access that could be turned off by a foreign country overnight."

The State Department cable dated July 16 did not refer to Anthropic or specifically to Trump's executive orders or last month's banning of the company, but provided American diplomats talking points designed for countering arguments that have arisen in their wake.

The cable stated that "Stopping narrow uses or requiring 30-day testing prior to the release a highly powerful new technology is not an 'Kill Switch.'" There is no'magic' button on the government's part. This narrative is exaggerated, and does not capture the nuances of U.S. Technology Policy."

AMERICAN AI SALE PITCH Rubio’s cable urged diplomats to oppose "so-called "digital sovereignty" initiatives. It defined these as efforts to restrict American technology firms' access foreign markets, subject them localization requirements, or force them follow local rules such as content moderating. Rubio had already told American diplomats earlier this year to oppose data sovereignty measures.

The cable discussed ways to counter "AI sovereignty", instructing American diplomats to promote American AI products as the best available tools and to describe efforts to create rival AI systems by scratch as a waste.

The cable stated that "American AI companies are able to build large, independent AI Infrastructure, with secure, robust supply chains, which minimizes backdoor risk." They build it. It's yours." Edward Fishman, Director of the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomics, at the Council on Foreign Relations said he understood the safety concerns that led the U.S. Government to impose first restrictions on Anthropic’s models which could turbocharge complex hacking activities. Fishman, however, said that the Trump administration's tendency to use coercive economic instruments such as tariffs or sanctions against both friends and enemies made the State Department pitch a difficult sell.

He said that European partners were worried that the U.S. might use their business as a weapon against them if they became "ultra-reliant" on U.S. frontier AI model like those by Anthropic or OpenAI. Salla, a European legislator, said that Trump's administration had repeatedly threatened countries such as Denmark, creating an atmosphere of distrust that could not be dispelled by rhetoric.

She said, "They haven't shown us that they are reliable business partners." Reporting by Raphael Satter; editing by Deepa Babyington and Lincoln Feast.

(source: Reuters)