Latest News

EU suspends discussions on law to combat companies' false 'green' claims

EU suspends discussions on law to combat companies' false 'green' claims

The European Union stopped Monday negotiations on a proposed law that would require companies to prove their claims of being climate-friendly. This was after the European Commission warned it could overburden smaller companies, and threatened to put the plan on hold.

This dispute is part of a series of moves by Brussels to simplify or weaken its green agenda. The EU wants to limit a backlash to ambitious environmental policies and reduce regulation for struggling industries.

A spokesperson for Poland which currently holds the rotating EU presidency said that it decided to cancel Monday's round of negotiations between EU countries and legislators who were trying to finalise EU's green claims laws.

The spokesperson stated, "We're hitting the pause" button. There are too many questions and we want clarity from the European Commission about its intentions. Then we can decide what to do next.

They said it was unclear if the negotiations would resume.

The European Commission which proposes new EU law said that it intends to withdraw the proposed law on green claims because EU countries indicated they want to expand the law so as to cover 30 millions of the EU's smaller companies.

The current discussion around the proposal goes against the Commission’s simplification agenda", a spokesperson for the Commission said on Friday. He was referring to the Commission’s efforts to simplify EU regulations for European businesses.

Last week, the Commission was also under pressure by centre-right EU legislators who demanded that this policy be scrapped.

The EU law was designed to eliminate misleading green labels on products ranging from clothing, cosmetics, and electronic goods. Labels like "natural", "climate-neutral" or "recycled contents" would be regulated.

In 2023, the Commission proposed new rules after assessing 150 product claims for environmental characteristics and finding that half of them were "vague, inaccurate or unfounded". Reporting by Kate Abnett, Editing by Alex Richardson

(source: Reuters)